If I remember correctly CO is partially burnt fuel, HC is unburnt fuel. I think what you are seeing is a bad cat. the possibility of a rich condition is unlikely due to the high NOx. you are close in every number so simply running the car at 3500 RPM for about a minute to heat the cat may work. if you have a non contact pyrometer you can measure cat function. the area at the upstream part of the cat should be about 100 degrees cooler then the output side due to the chemical reaction. It's been a while since I have done smog tech stuff so I am a bit rusty. Anyone, feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Darkstar -----Original Message----- From: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Townsley Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:50 PM To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [DML] Emissions Tuning > my car has failed the new state auto emissions testing protocol in CT. > > The results were as follows: > > HC(PPM) CO (%) NOx (PPM) > > > > Allowed 172 0.55 1207 > > > > Emissions 205 1.52 1548 > > Contributing factors could be that I have twin turbos with out cats > and I have an exhaust manifold leak. I recall some previous > discussion on the DML about adjusting the car to pass emissions > testing without a cat (and if fact my car did pass 3 years ago). > Can anyone tell me what tuning proceedure I should use to get the > lowest possible emissions. Thank you. > > Sincerely, > > Mike Townsley To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/