All of the litriture of the period said "Leather Seating Surfaces". That translates into a lot of the interior is NOT leather! BTW the leather is Connally and they use it liberally in Jaguars among other British marques. For it's time period the Delorean was about average once it got past it's teething problems like the alternator and the recalls. For a short-lived production car they got a lot of it right. In hindsight we can see a lot more of the flaws and weak points but that is NOT how it looked in 1981-82. It was one of the hotest, most desirable cars in the sports car market. A little pricer that DMC had hoped and a little less spirited in performance but an eye-catcher. The car is a collection of compromises. Some can be improved and others have to be lived with. I don't think Lotus deliberatly sabotaged the Delorean project. They had a budget to work with and they did. The Lotus Engineering Group were masters at building cars from parts bins. DMC was NOT the only customer and engineering project they did. They did (and still do) a lot of engineering for most auto manufacturers including GM. David Teitelbaum vin 10757 --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Gutkowski <martin@...> wrote: > > I categorically disagree with you on that entire statement. About the > only thing that was better on the Epsirt was performance and handling. > And I would agree they probably DID deliberately cripple the DeLorean on > handling. > > I have a good friend who has been running an S2 Esprit daily for much of > the last year (until he spanked it last month). The interior is a horrid > place to be compared to a DeLorean. It's noisy, harsh, rattly and > uncomfortable. So much of the switchgear, door handles etc are > recognisable from other (usually Leyland) cars - at least JZD had the > sense to disguise the samll number he used! The engine might have put a > lot of power out for its displacement (for the time) but needed > rebuilding every year, and the word "quality" does come to mind when > someone who is used to a DeLorean chassis looks at an early Esprit one, > but usually following the words "not what I'd call..." GKN did the DMC12 > proud, whereas Lotus continued to build their own, and it shows. > > Martin To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/