Re: [doc] Re: FW: Rear Springs/ shockers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [doc] Re: FW: Rear Springs/ shockers
- From: Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:13:34 +0100
MGB also suffered the longer spring modification.
From a very basic engineering point of view - at what angle do you
think the suspension arms should sit? If the steering rack is not
positioned so the track rods are level, you get bump steer. The rear is
the same given the DeLorean's geometry. So adjustable collars on the
rear shocks and adjustable lower links are the way to go
IMHO of course.
Martin
Claire Usher wrote:
> I always thought the ride height was governed by the US regulations -
> if you
> look at, for instance, a 1970's Lamborghini Countach in USA spec, it has
> ridiculous front bumpers to comply with the USA regulations of the
> time. I
> think that is also why the MGB had to have those horrible rubber bumpers??
> Can anyone on the list confirm this?
>
>
>
> Claire
>
> #2292 (Euro ride height on front)
>
> DOC171
DOC UK Website: www.deloreans.co.uk
Unsubscribe: doc-uk-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
** Unless otherwise stated, all messages posted to the group are assumed public and may be printed in the club magazine **
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN