[DML] Re: Lotus Esprit Rear Suspension
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DML] Re: Lotus Esprit Rear Suspension
- From: "John Dore" <dmcjohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:49:51 -0000
Hi Tom,
I agree with you - the original suspension design is very poor.
The later Esprit's had a much better front lower control arm, you
can see a pic here:
http://www.delorean.ie/images/009_oblique_view_lh_jpg.jpg
Didn't Toby Peterson do something similar with his car years ago? I
seem to remember him adding extra links on the front lower
suspension in order to triangulate the arm, and he had good results.
But, your approach sounds great, to design a new frame. Are you
going with a tubular design rather than the original stressed skin
folded sheetmetal?
You might find the following 2 links interesting - a tubular version
of our backbone frames, with proper double wishbone suspension:
http://www.banks-europa.co.uk/cars/chassis.htm
and
http://www.spydercars.co.uk/pg3_special_projects.htm
Looking forward to seeing the results, best of luck!
Regards,
John
--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tom Niemczewski" <dmctom@...> wrote:
>
> Andy
>
> That is exactly what I'm saying. The D suspension is such a bad
design that
> when trying to improve it I need to redesign pretty much
everything. The
> best thing would be to start from scratch but since the body of
the car
> limits the possibilities I will have to stick with the original
design and
> change as much as possible to make it work like it should.
> What I don't like about the current setup?
> 1. Sway bar should only work as a sway bar. The way it is designed
it
> controls the caster and toe and both those values change wildly
depending on
> acceleration/braking forces. Very bad design
> 2. Lower control arm should be "A" shaped, not "I" like it is now.
> 3. Lower ball joint carries the entire weight of the front of the
car, yet
> is very small. This is a very dangerous design.
> 4. Trailing arm bolts - no comments... it's this bad
> 5. Rear shock lower mount - horrible design where the mount is
working
> rotated almost 90 degrees from actual movement at the joint.
Result - The
> joint doesn't work, the bushing gets crushed, the shock is being
bent
>
> I was expecting something better in case of the Esprit as I've
never seen
> the suspension components. Seeing the pictures I can say YES, the
Esprit
> suspension is a very bad design too. At least when it comes to the
rear. I
> have not seen the front setup yet.
>
> Andy, what is interesting is that it is very surprising to me as
well! I've
> always heard about the world class suspension from Lotus... but it
seems it
> was just words. In reality it doesn't look as good. It might be a
bit better
> than that on the D. Better materials, stronger components, but in
the end it
> is the same basic design... very poor design. I am VERY surprised!
>
> I'll post pictures of my new frame soon. I am trying to fix as
many mistakes
> that Lotus have made as possible. More to come soon....
>
>
> Tom Niemczewski
> vin 6149 (in Poland!)
> Google earth: 52°25'17.30"N 21° 1'58.00"E
> dmctom@...
> www.deloreana.com
------------------------------------
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN