Hi Tom, I agree with you - the original suspension design is very poor. The later Esprit's had a much better front lower control arm, you can see a pic here: http://www.delorean.ie/images/009_oblique_view_lh_jpg.jpg Didn't Toby Peterson do something similar with his car years ago? I seem to remember him adding extra links on the front lower suspension in order to triangulate the arm, and he had good results. But, your approach sounds great, to design a new frame. Are you going with a tubular design rather than the original stressed skin folded sheetmetal? You might find the following 2 links interesting - a tubular version of our backbone frames, with proper double wishbone suspension: http://www.banks-europa.co.uk/cars/chassis.htm and http://www.spydercars.co.uk/pg3_special_projects.htm Looking forward to seeing the results, best of luck! Regards, John --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tom Niemczewski" <dmctom@...> wrote: > > Andy > > That is exactly what I'm saying. The D suspension is such a bad design that > when trying to improve it I need to redesign pretty much everything. The > best thing would be to start from scratch but since the body of the car > limits the possibilities I will have to stick with the original design and > change as much as possible to make it work like it should. > What I don't like about the current setup? > 1. Sway bar should only work as a sway bar. The way it is designed it > controls the caster and toe and both those values change wildly depending on > acceleration/braking forces. Very bad design > 2. Lower control arm should be "A" shaped, not "I" like it is now. > 3. Lower ball joint carries the entire weight of the front of the car, yet > is very small. This is a very dangerous design. > 4. Trailing arm bolts - no comments... it's this bad > 5. Rear shock lower mount - horrible design where the mount is working > rotated almost 90 degrees from actual movement at the joint. Result - The > joint doesn't work, the bushing gets crushed, the shock is being bent > > I was expecting something better in case of the Esprit as I've never seen > the suspension components. Seeing the pictures I can say YES, the Esprit > suspension is a very bad design too. At least when it comes to the rear. I > have not seen the front setup yet. > > Andy, what is interesting is that it is very surprising to me as well! I've > always heard about the world class suspension from Lotus... but it seems it > was just words. In reality it doesn't look as good. It might be a bit better > than that on the D. Better materials, stronger components, but in the end it > is the same basic design... very poor design. I am VERY surprised! > > I'll post pictures of my new frame soon. I am trying to fix as many mistakes > that Lotus have made as possible. More to come soon.... > > > Tom Niemczewski > vin 6149 (in Poland!) > Google earth: 52°25'17.30"N 21° 1'58.00"E > dmctom@... > www.deloreana.com ------------------------------------ To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/