Hmmm ... what to say in reply to Marc Levy's comments... - I did not intend that articles be written just for DMC's magazine. I think DMC's magazine, DOA's magazine and the E-Zine, if it ever comes back, would all benefit from articles written by the many experts that subscribe to the DML. There is a lot of knowledge and interesting folks out there and their contributions could be worth while. - I believe that we all benefit from the DML and any Delorean related magazines. The benefit is directly related to the content and quality of the articles. For years I subscribed to the DOA magazine and they had some good content. I quit when the content moved away from things I found interesting and moved towards social gatherings. But in their defense I realized how difficult it is to write new engaging articles year after year. - Everyone needs to maker their own decision about writing articles and compensation (or lack of). Personally I hope all the Delorean vendors are very successful. Competition is good and we need them. The two "for-fee" magazines might want to consider giving free subscriptions for articles. It might spur some really great content. - When I suggested that the DML promote the various publications I meant that we contribute our individual time and talent to help with articles, not that it gets advertised on the DML. And note that there are a lot of publications, other than the three mentioned here, that articles could be submitted. - My post was mainly responding to some criticism of the new magazine and was suggesting that instead of THEY making it better that WE can help make it better. I hope this clears things a little. If not, it may generate some new life for the DML. Even the DML's topics get a little stale after a while and it needs some new content. Now I'm going to create a second message that posts some ideas for articles and attempts to generate more from the readers. Nick Kemp