The concours judging DOES mean a whole lot more than a trophy! A car Marque is valued at what a concours #1 condition example is worth. Like in a concours all cars are valued at what a #1 condition is worth and dollars (like points) are deducted for deviations from #1 condition. For the lucky few that do have a concours car they will be at the top of the heap. For cars in less than # 1 condition their cars will be valued somewhat less. In many ways the concours will help all owners as there will be a benchmark against which all Deloreans can be judged. The higher the value of a #1 concours winner the higher the values of ALL Deloreans. Of course for any particular Delorean it's value will be determined by how closely (or how far) it measures up against a #1 car. We can argue about the 83's and what exactly an 83 should consist of. Unfortunatly the records that could help are long gone so it is a subjective call as to what is "correct". Since no club runs a concours it is left to DMCH to do it. Better them than no one. I believe that if you really feel this strongly about concours than you shoule push for a local club to hold a concours and you can participate in making your own rules. Concours is not for every owner but every owner has a stake in how they are conducted. It is just that there is so little interest in a concours it is hard to justify all the work it would take for a local club to do it. At the last concours there were not enough cars to judge. Correct me if I am wrong but there were only 3 cars. In such a case all 3 would place no matter what the condition. I would add a rule that for a Concours to be held there must be at least 6 cars to be judged and the top 3 must fall within a 10 point spread for the top 3 for the concours to be legitamite. Without this rule you could have a first place 80 point car, a 2nd place 60 point car and a 3rd place 40 point car. This makes a mockery of anyone that had won an earlier concours, the first place would not measure up to a previous 1st place winner and so on for 2nd and 3rd. Of course all this is just My Humble Opinion. BTW I don't like the idea that you could "modify" a car and make it "correct". If a car has one type of tailpipe then they should not be changed unless you know for sure that they were changed to the incorrect ones in the past. Ditto for the hood, antennae, and the many other things that differentiate one car from another. An origional owner (if he is honest) knows what the origional condition of HIS car was. Of course there is no way for him to know if the dealer did anything BEFORE he bought it! David Teitelbaum vin 10757 --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote: > > In Pigeon Forge, I had the pleasure of spending time > with Tom Grippenburg and his wife. Tom is the owner > of a 17000 vin car, 17168. He is the original owner > of the car. > > While having dinner the first night, Ken Montgomery > (the head concours judge) happen to walk by. Being my > normal controversial self, I engaged him in a > discussion about the competition. > > For those of you who may not know, I am firmly against > the idea of this competition. For these cars to be > considered "the best of the best" based on the > criteria of being as the factory built them, the > judging manual better be accurate. You are fooling > around with the value of someones property. > To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/