Did any of my other replies stop you? Go for it. I love to learn. Greg _____ From: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jonheese Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 11:09 PM To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [DMCForum] Re: the EV1... vs Diesel Seriously? Are you for real with this? I don't want to reply to this until I'm sure you're not joking... Regards, Jon Heese --- In DMCForum@yahoogroup <mailto:DMCForum%40yahoogroups.com> s.com, "timnagin" <timnagin@...> wrote: > > >Why do we need to stop using oil? Uhhh... because it contributes to > >atmospheric carbon, water pollution, acid rain, (potentially) global > >warming trends, government and corporate corruption (although, to be > >fair, that's not the technology's fault), it's horribly "unclean" when > >compared to "alternate" energy sources, it's non-renewable and > >dwindling, and it's not the only thing out there anymore... > > > So does your breathing, eating and moose farts. You stated exactly what I > did, in that anything else that comes along to replace Big Oil is going to > have the same thing happen - government and corporate corruption. Getting > rid of oil will not solve those last two. > > > >I'm not sure what using exclusively domestic oil will do, except lower > >domestic petroleum prices, impact the environment in some of the > >proposed drilling sites, and create domestic jobs. None of these > >effects address any of my concerns (in a positive way). > > > Lowering domestic petroleum prices and creating jobs wouldn't be a good > thing? Any new source of energy is going to have an environmental impact > unless we find a ZPM. > > > >Still, in order to be considered "renewable", an energy source must > >not be depletable. That is, in the case of a physical fuel, it must > >be produced faster than it is consumed. If the earth (or more > >accurately, its collection of dead life-forms) is producing fossil > >fuels faster than we consume them, this is shocking news to me. I > >would be very interested in reading that study. > > > You contradicted yourself here. If it is renewable it is renewable. We may > be consuming it faster than it can create itself, but it is renewing. If it > is, then it takes no action from us to do so like planting trees which means > our total carbon impact is less. To plant trees we need trucks and tools > and people, plus all of the things associated with making those work. I > will have to look for the study I read and post a link. It's been awhile. > > > >Furthermore, even if this were true, and fossil fuels were now > >consider renewable, there are plenty of very compelling reasons to NOT > >use it, as I mentioned already above. Its growing scarcity is the > >only thing guaranteed to ween us off it, but it's the least compelling > >reason in my mind for us to look to other energy sources. > > > As I mentioned before, if the scarcity is the only thing keeping us from > implementing other sources then we should use it up as fast as possible to > force a change. As long as it is cheaper to use oil we will continue to do > so. It's very basic economics. > > Greg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:DMCForum-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:DMCForum-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/