 
[DMCForum] Re: Gas alternatives, then?
    
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCForum] Re: Gas alternatives, then?
- From: "therealdmcvegas" <dmcvegas@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:45:09 -0000
Bio-diesel does NOT pollute, except with soot for unburned fuel that 
is expelled. Diesel is itself a ULEV fuel. But when you throw bio-
diesel into the mix, it burns even cleaner because there is ZERO 
sulphur! Which means no acid-rain!
-Robert
--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxx> wrote:
> Marc Levy wrote:
> 
> > ... And one has to wonder why this is not done
> > commercially?  
> 
> It costs more to produce commercially than petrochemical derv.... 
by 
> about 20%. But in UK prices, it means about 5p/litre more. 
Considering 
> more than 50p is tax at the moment, and the whole argument for tax 
is 
> that it discourages use and therefore is good for the environment 
(which 
> is bollocks by even the most basic economic argument). Burning 
> Bio-diesel still pollutes the cities but on a global scale does 
> absolutely nothing because the emissions are the result of plants 
that 
> absorbed those emissions the year before, so no imbalance in CO2.
> 
> > Heck, it is almost impossible to even
> > buy a diesel in the USA.
> >
> > (Just spent the weekend replacing the engine in my
> > friends F250 Diesel...  Man those things a HEAVY!)
> 
> Cast iron blocks, even on modern ones becuase they have to be so 
much 
> stronger
> 
> Martin
    
  
  
    SPONSORED LINKS
  
       
  
  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
  
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN