Houston Part #100840SS advertises stainless U joints (don't know for certain if they are Borgeson, but they do look extremely similar: http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/250791_419473391431250_795529762_n.jpg ) Toby's lower column definitely uses stainless Borgeson U joints. Spec .02 is functionally/actually identical (DD shaft for the prototype) to those options, with the addition of a vibration reducing U joint -- stainless of course. Given the amount of money owners spend on stainless DMC loco doodads, a 16% premium -- $30.12 -- for stainless U joints seems reasonable to me. Bill Robertson #5939 --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "daveswingle2" <swingle_dmc@...> wrote: > > Yes, and the active parts (i.e. the bearings and cross) are most likely not stainless in any case. It's just prettier. > ------------------------------------ To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/