Having 2 belts instead of 1 does not necessaraly make the set-up more dependable. I have seen many cases where one belt gets thrown off or rolls over and catches other belts causing them all to fail. The # of belts is mainly a function of how much power you are trying to transfer. If it is near the capacity of 1 belt then the designer may either go to a method with a higher amount of power transfer (more expensive) or just add another belt. In our case 1 belt is more than sufficient. Just make sure it is aligned, tensioned properly, the pulleys are not worn or bent, and replace the belt every 10 years or so. A loose belt will quickly fail from all the heat generated. Heat is the big enimy of a belt (usually caused by being loose). The second biggest cause is being overtightened. This stretches the cords causing them to break. As you can see setting the tension on a belt is important. David Teitelbaum vin 10757 --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote: > > FWIW, it would be nice to have a twin belt waterpump > p To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/