Mats car and copyright

[kKoncelik@xxxx]

I felt I had to respond to this after I checked it out and I have to agree 
with Matt that this photo has been lifted off the DeLorean Car Show Web page.

As most of you know we encourage the use of the photos and materials on the 
web page but in no other case has anyone ever claimed it was original and after 
being notified continue to do so.  

The seller is Zedder221 

Here are some of the items I noticed that tip it off as a copy not an 
original. 
and is taken from the e-mail I sent him.

>From my e-mail to Zedder221

Just to indicate the similarities these are these are some of the things we 
noticed about your "Original artwork"

The shadows are the same as the photographers photo of Matts car

The door strap is in the identical location on the drivers door and because 
of shadowing you missed it on the passengers side.

The shadow on the front facia is the same 

The light highlights on the drivers side rear quarter panel are the same

The lighting highlights on the drivers seat and rear compartment are the 
same.

The Shadow on the windshield is the same.

You missed the door strut on the passenger side. ? Any DeLorean owner knows 
they are on the back. ? All the errors are on the area that was deleted and 
brushed back.

There is a sun deflector in the windshield (this matches the picture)

Coincidentally the shadow on the hood matches 

The wheel spokes although altered the remaining ones line up exactly as they 
do on the photo.

The dark shadowing from the sun deflector is on this poster and unless it was 
the same car it is not probable it would have the same shadowing. ? In your 
photo it should not be there.

Left front fender highlights are the same.

I'd love you to prove me wrong but I don't think so.

A copy of this is also being sent to e-bay along with the photos they already 
have

I am the last person to get picky on some of this stuff but this is blatant 
copyright violation and passing it off as original is wrong. If it didn't say 
original I would not have written this.

Ken


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]