David - Now that I am back in Houston on a full-time basis, it's my intent to devote more time to the concours rules and judging. Here are my thoughts after reading your recent posting to the DML. > This is an open letter to other Technical Editors and the general > membership of the DML. Just to satisfy my own desire to completely understand your posting - who are the other technical editors, and what is the criteria used to differentiate a technical editor from a general member? Who set up this criteria and dictates who is and who is not a technical editor? This term used in relationship to participants of the DML is new to me, and I'm sorry if I have missed something on this earlier. > DMC Houston doesn't need to be the final and ultimate authority on the > judging rules. As owners and "keepers of the Marque" we all have a > stake in how the rules are created, interpeted, and applied. Everyone We took the 'horse by the reins' regarding the concours when DeLorean One and the DOA were willing to let it die. DeLorean Motor Company does have an interest in seeing the car progress into more of a 'classic' car - and a concours is one of several ways that can be achieved. There are some who would say that the car is already a 'classic' or will get there on it's own eventually. Rather than let it runs it's own course, we took a proactive role. Personally, I take exception to your statement the owners "have a stake in how the rules are created, interpreted, and applied". I would agree with you if this statement were not so broadly applied - those owners that prefer to make radical appearance, structural and other changes to the car are probably not the best people to have a hand in this. > should get a copy of the judging manual and if there are any comments, > suggestions, corrections, etc WE need to make it happen. In most other As you know, the Judging Manual as it currently exists was created from the 'best known available data'. This data is available at every event for review by competitors, judges and observers alike. I am always searching for new material to clarify and further refine the manual - this is being written as I fly to Cleveland to view the Crawford Museum's extensive library of DeLorean historical data donated by Consolidated International in the early 80's. Additionally, as the warehouse move has been completed, I now have instant access to all the materials there, including a complete set of engineering drawings for the car, and perhaps more importantly in regard to concours, a copy of the ECA (Engineering Change Authority) documents (over 4,000). Many of this indicate introduction points in the production line. Which brings up, again, the issue of the basis on which the cars are judged. We all know that the QAC's introduced many variables into the cars prior to delivery to dealers. To date, there have been no records of what changes were applied to various VIN's at the QAC's. In the absence of that data, we can reliably use only the data from the factory. A good example of this, which has been incorporated into the judging process concerns the alternators. Every document discovered to date, save one, said the Motorola alternator was introduced at VIN 4540. We discovered a DeLorean Motor Company Internal Service Bulletin which indicates that some post-4540 VIN's were indeed released from the factory with the Ducellier alternator. The total number of cars affected was less than 20, but at least one of those cars is a concours quality car belonging to a DML'er. So, in summation, when the data surfaces to merit a change in the rules as they currently exist, changes are made. But to arbitrarily change the rules without that data defeats the purpose. > car clubs the general membership through various committes arbitrate > and interpet the rules for their Marque. I am proposing that we of the > Deloreans do the same. The situation for the 83's is ambiguous to say > the least and could use a lot of clarifacation. In many other Marques Sadly, the DML is not a club. Years ago it was my intent to evolve the DML into a club, providing an alternative to the club(s) that were then in existence. In the absence of any formal 'body', the risk is great of individuals making the rules to suit their own objectives and motives. The objective of DeLorean Motor Company in creating a more extensive and structured concours (as opposed to the old concours managed by the DOA, and which Millennium was based upon) is, as you yourself said, "to elevate the Deloreans to a higher level of value". The only other thing I would add to that is "respect in the collector car community" as well as an elevated public image - separating the CAR from the MOVIE (people don't look at Tucker and refer to it as a movie car, for example). Separating the CAR from the stigma related to the demise of the company, and setting the story straight would also be secondary goals of a successful concours program. It has been discussed slowly spinning off the Millennium Concours to an independent body of owner/enthusiasts, but the recent spiteful remarks and negative attitudes only go to show that the time is not right to do that yet. > some changes relating to safety do not carry any penalties. Although This has been an area that has been brought up repeatedly, and I'm pleased to say that changes in that area will be in place for the Memphis event. > DMC Houston has done a great job for NO COMPENSATION short of the > parts business that the concours generates we as the owners should That's a good point - DeLorean Motor Company produced (and continuously maintains) the concours as it currently exists for ZERO compensation. In time and money expended to put on each concours, it's around a couple thousand dollars. Considering the number of competitors in the last two or three events, the return on investment in the form of parts sales has been negligible. Factor in that ALL the vendors (including individuals like DMC Joe, John Hervey and Darryl Tinnerstet to name a few) have and sell original parts, our prospects for a return are even less enticing. > have some participation in the proccess and the selection of judges. Attracting judges for a concours until DeLorean Motor Company started managing the event was never an easy task. In order to attract judges for the events, we sought out a group of individuals that were widely viewed as unbiased and knowledgeable. DeLorean Motor Company has tried to make judging attractive by offering perks in the form of a hosted judges breakfast before the event, apparel, parts discounts and at one event, even paying for the hotel rooms of the judges. As a courtesy to the judges, DeLorean Motor Company has extended the invitation to judge future events to experienced judges who are familiar with the manual and judging procedures. In two of the last four events, we had a complete slate of returning judges. In the other two events, new judges were used, and they volunteered, answering an email posted to the DML calling for judges. The event in Memphis will have at least one 'newbie' judge, and I am pleased that a member of DeLorean Owners Club of the UK will be attending Ken's show and returning as a judge. > Past winners of a concours could make some of the best judges and > since they are inelegable to compete for some time they are impartial > and highly knowledgable. If you agree with me and would like to do That's a interesting idea, David. If any of the past concours winners would be interested in judging, I will make a special effort to find a place for them to judge in Memphis. > something about it E-mail me directly. Of course this is MHO. In many > other car clubs to get into the "concours" you need to win some local > events so as to weed out the true concours from the drivers. This > could inspire more local judging events. In the end judging by a That is one of the features of the Millennium already in place. Any judge who has judged at least four of the six different categories is eligible to serve as a 'Head Judge" at ANY local or national event. Without my notes in front of me, there are at least two or three judges that are eligible to act in that role, should they desire (Marty Maier and Ken Montgomery are two that come to mind). If DeLorean Mid-Atlantic or another group in the northeast would like to have a Millennium concours, the coordinator from that group should contact me and I will see what I can arrange to get an eligible judge to that event to act as a head judge, and the rest of judges can be selected in a way acceptable to both the head judge and the coordinators of the local event - does that sound fair? > comprehensive and standard set of rules will elevate the Deloreans to > a higher level of value which is good for everybody. My sentiments EXACTLY. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. James Espey NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS/PHONE NUMBERS DeLorean Motor Company 15023 Eddie Drive Humble, Texas 77396 281/441-2537 Voice 281/441-2813 Fax 800/USA-DMC1 http://www.delorean.com