I used to work at a part store and we also sold short and long block engines, 90% were GM, 8% were Chrysler, 1% were Ford and the other 1% was AMC which uses GM and Ford. Really i don't trash any makes of cars because all manufactures have there good and bad models. It seems to me that GM tries to squeeze too much HP out of there engines and that seems to lower the longevity of there engines. I know there are plenty of 150,000 or higher mileage GM engines out there that are still running strong. Ford seems to lack on the HP but is stronger at the longevity of their engines. Chrysler on the other hand keeps reinventing it's self because of all of the crappy models they have had and that makes it harder to me to judge there reliability of there engines except the ones they are running in the Ram Trucks. It seems every few years they drop old names of cars and relabel them as something new, they don't have any models anymore that date back to the 70's or 80's like Ford and GM except for the 300 Chrysler they brought back a few years ago. Just my $.02 so go ahead and trash my opinions if you would like. Like i said all manufactures have their good and bad models. Mark Come see my snow covered Delorean. http://photos.yahoo.com/snextime [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT <http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cb3ufud/M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=egro upweb/S=1705126215:HM/EXP=1071174673/A=1853619/R=0/*http://www.netflix.com /Default?mqso=60178356&partid=4116730> click here <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=egroupm ail/S=:HM/A=1853619/rand=349687197> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN