Fw: [DML] Re: Trailing Arm Bolts - Engineering
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fw: [DML] Re: Trailing Arm Bolts - Engineering



----- Original Message -----
From: <tobyp@xxxx>
To: <dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:52 AM
Subject: [DML] Re: Trailing Arm Bolts - Engineering


> David - You are quite correct in your assessment that the tubes and
> sleeves will collapse if the torque is increased significantly. I
> installed the new bolts at a torque level of 50 ft-lbs, with a
> copper-based anti-seize compound applied to the shank and threads.
> That is the same value as the "stock bolts" as I recall. Forgive me,
> but I ran some numbers today on the preload in the bolts caused by the
> installation torque. I wanted to see how much tensile stress we put
> on the bolts by torqueing to that level. It revealed some interesting
> information ... without going into the calculations in detail, a
> torque of 50 ft-lbs on the TAB with grease on the threads and shank
> would create a tensile (tension) stress of about 116 KSI. (Remember
> that 1 KSI = 1,000 PSI). If the threads on the bolt and nut are
> perfectly clean and dry, the tensile stress value at 50 ft-lbs of
> torque is 48.3 KSI. Trust me on this ... it just works out that way.
> The actual preload is probably somewhere in between those two
> extremes, but it varies depending on the cleanliness of the hardware.
> The average of the two is about 82 KSI. If you are brave enough to
> muscle through a previous post of mine, the maximum allowable tensile
> yield stress on the stock bolts is 103 KSI. We are probably coming
> close to yielding, or stretching, the TAB every time it is torqued.
> The variation could also explain why some people have a problem with
> their TAB's , and others do not. My custom bolts have an allowable
> tensile yield stress of 200 KSI, so they would only get to about 1/2
> of their capability at maximum torque. Okay ... I'm done. I just
> thought that you'd like to know.
>
> BTW - What are some of these other solutions that vendors have come up
> with? I haven't seen "The Fix" for this area yet ... just a lot of
> hand-wringing, and guessing. Please advise.
>
>
> --- In dmcnews@xxxx, jtrealty@xxxx wrote:
> > All of what you wrote was interesting but it comes down to putting
> > more stress on the bolt then it will see in service by torquing it
> > above that level. If you go overboard you will collapse the metal
> > spacer in the radius arm bushing pn 106716. As is usually the case
> you
> > cannot improve an entire system by changing one part. It usually
> takes
> > a reengineering of the entire system or you just move the weak point
> > to somewhere else in the system. Before you continue you should
> > discuss this with a Delorean vender as they have all "been
> there-done
> > that" and now have a good way to fix this weak area. There is no
> > substitute for experience so before starting on a new project like
> > this you should get all of the history that you can.
> > David Teitelbaum
> > vin 10757
>
>
>
>
> To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
> moderator@xxxx
>
> To search the archives or view files, log in at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>





Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN 


Copyright ProjectVixen.com. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated