 
Re: [doc] BTI Info.
    
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [doc] BTI Info.
- From: "Dave Redfern" <d.n.redfern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:31:44 -0000
What is the address to apeal to?   I don't own a D yet but want the 
option of importing one in the future so  shouldn't I write in as 
well.  There are about 211 members of this group so potentially 211 
letters of appeal go go in.  Anybody any ideas or thoughts on what 
content the appeal letters should contain (facts, figures and 
references etc)for maximum effect?
I suppose the good exchange rate between the pound & the dollar has 
made it more affordable to import so maybe there have been more of 
them and thats made them sit up and take notice.
Regards
Dave
--- In doc-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Stuart Dyke VIN#6463" <stuart@xxxx> 
wrote:
> 
> This is a very good point!! I believe i personally will not be 
drawn 
> into this. But if they can't chase the present owner because they 
> didnt import it and they can't chase the previous owner who 
imported 
> it! Why not all those affected by this situation get together and 
> swap registration documents ie sign them over to another owner & 
vice 
> versa for a period of say 6mths! Maybe some issues with insurance 
but 
> sounds good in theory!! Dont you think??
> 
> Stuart
> BKZ9095
> #6463
> 
> 
> --- In doc-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Chris Williams" <chris@xxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Ok, I understand this so far. But how about cars that are recent 
> > imports (as is mine) but has been sold on by the person that 
> > imported it (to me)? 
> > Who will they chase for duty, the chap who no longer owns the car 
> > but imported it or the present owner?
> > or will they only pick on people who still own the cars they 
> > imported?
> > Just my thoughts
> > Chris
> > 
> > --- In doc-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dean Mitchell" <deanscheme@xxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > Got my BTI letter too, to be honest I thought it'd have a bill 
> > attached.
> > > 
> > > >From: Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxx>
> > > >Reply-To: doc-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >To: doc-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: Re: [doc] BTI Info.
> > > >Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:49:22 +0000
> > > >
> > > >...and the reason they give is that it "appears to be a mass-
> > produced
> > > >car" - well, if you all used the text I wrote many moons ago 
we 
> > ALL
> > > >stated that 6000 are believed to survive worldwide.
> > > >
> > > >They -can- come after the tax for up to 2 years BTW. So KEEP 
> THAT 
> > LETTER
> > > >SAFE in which they say they won't
> > > >
> > > >Martin (BTI issued in August 2001 so I'm safe!)
> > > >
> > > >Richard wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >OK, hands up how many people nearly fell over when they got 
a 
> > letter
> > > > >from HMCE this morning notifying them that the BTI for their 
> > car is
> > > > >invalid?
> > > > >
> > > > >For one horrifying moment I thought they were going to try 
and 
> > back-date
> > > > >the duty!!!
> > > > >
> > > > >Fortunately it was just informational. However they do give 
the
> > > > >opportunity to appeal the decision, something I fully intend 
> to 
> > do.
> > > > >
> > > > >If you haven't had your letter yet, I imagine you will do 
> soon. 
> > There is
> > > > >strength in numbers - I would urge everybody to appeal, not 
> > necessarily
> > > > >for your own benefit but for those who would like to own a 
> > DeLorean and
> > > > >have now been taxed out of the dream.
> > > > >
> > > > >Rich H
> > > > >DOC 365 VIN 1274
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
DOC UK Website: www.deloreans.co.uk
Unsubscribe: doc-uk-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
** Unless otherwise stated, all messages posted to the group are assumed public and may be printed in the club magazine **
Yahoo! Groups Links
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN