Re: [DML] Upgraded Front Suspension
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] Upgraded Front Suspension
- From: "Tom Niemczewski" <dmctom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:11:32 +0200
From: "Martin Gutkowski"
> Ed's setup attempts to restrain the fore/aft movement of the arm
> altogether when there is a reason for it in the first place.
> Martin
Martin,
What is the intended fore/aft movement in the LCA? What's the reason for it
and what good does that movement do?
I can't see any advantage in having LCAs so sloppy. To me this setup is
nothing short of a disaster. Under braking when the arms move back they
compress the springs unevenly, put unnecessary strain on the shocks and the
most important thing it destroys the entire geometry of the suspension
system - caster becomes positive, camber becomes positive, toe goes way in.
If the goal here is to loose grip and destroy the tires then this setup is
perfect.
Am I missing something? Please put me on the right track.
Thank you
Greetings from Poland!
Tom Niemczewski
Vin 6149 plus 2418, 3633, 5030, 16473, 17086
Google earth: 52°25'17.66"N, 21° 1'58.40"E
------------------------------------
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN