Re: [DML] top speed
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] top speed
- From: mike.griese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:33:24 +0000
170mph in a DeLorean with a stock suspension and a stock frame is
a pretty risky proposition in my opinion. The DeLorean frame is not
all that stiff, and a flexible frame at those kind of speeds leads to
unpredictable handling. If you were on a deserted airstrip somewhere
with no turns and lots of room to slow down, 170 might not feel
too bad.
--
Mike
-------------- Original message from "byrondelorean" <celiambyron@xxxxxxx>: --------------
> Does anybody know how fast a Legend twin turbo, Turbo Manifold Co.
> twin turbo, single turbo kits, DMCH Stage 1, stage 2 or the 300HP
> single turbo we have all heard rumors about; but can now read about by
> clicking the link below? http://www.delorean.co.uk/turbocharging.html
> I would love to hear the descriptions of owner's tests against a
> wristwatch 1/4 mile and top speed output.
> This will put some closure to the original motor discussion. Any one
> wanting more boost can get it for a price. The original motor, be as
> it may, is reliable and does the speed limit perfectly.
> Competing sports cars during the Delorean development and
> manufacturing phase, were not as fast or much faster, most shared
> similar if not less HP. Consider the Datsun 280Z, or the 80, 81
> Corvette, even the 80,81Ferrari 308 had a top speed of 145-155
> something like that. Emissions killed it for everyone. I would feel
> safer holding the pedal to the floor in a DeLorean than a Datsun 280Z
> or early 80's vette, Porsche and BMW any day. Put extra power in those
> cars and they are death machines. It seems you can increase lots of
> power in the D. I was told the stock transmission is built to
> withstand 300HP. With better stopping power, I would have no problem
> driving a Delorean 170MPH. how safe would you feel with comparable
> upgrades to any of the competing cars of that era? The Delorean to me
> keeps getting better. I get the feeling the car had poor reviews
> because of lucrative scandals with editors of car magazines in those
> days. The car drove beautifully and they knew it. Today when editors
> drive the car, it's a much different attitude in a positive way. There
> is no pressure from anyone anywhere to speak untruthful.
> I personally believe there would be less DeLorean today for us to
> enjoy if they made them racers. Imagine how many lives, tickets and
> repair bills the DeLorean has saved.
> John DeLorean had it right.
>
>
>
>
> BDC
>
>
>
> http://www.delorean.co.uk/turbocharging.html
> --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "spaceace3113"
> wrote:
> >
> > a more streamlined body, lighter weight....
> >
> > Martin, out of curiousity what makes you say the GTA is more
> > streamlined aerodynamically? I'm kinda under the impressison the
> > Delorean is more streamlined than tha Alpine., Not arguing,just
> > asking. with better gearing the Delorean should be able to reach 140
> > in my opinion of course.
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN