spaceace3113 wrote: > Martin, out of curiousity what makes you say the GTA is more >streamlined aerodynamically? I'm kinda under the impressison the >Delorean is more streamlined than tha Alpine., Not arguing,just >asking. with better gearing the Delorean should be able to reach 140 >in my opinion of course. > That's the way it was designed - the GTA was designed in a wind-tunnel, I believe. http://www.delorean.co.uk/gta.jpeg It's mainly the nose that looks considerably different and more slippery http://www.emagineproductions.co.uk/delorean/Acecafe/pages/Ace%201_jpg.htm (the red one is a LeMans special edition GTA turbo) http://www.emagineproductions.co.uk/delorean/Acecafe/pages/Ace%203_jpg.htm (early one in foreground) The GTA's were all parked with their rear wheels up a small bank which is why they look so much lower than the DeLoreans! In reality, they ride at a very similar height. 4th and 5th ratios are as follows DeLorean/NA GTA: 1.04 0.82 GTA Turbo: 0.96 0.76 Hope this answers your question Martin To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/