Re: [DML] Re: Failed emmissions AGAIN
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] Re: Failed emmissions AGAIN
- From: Owen Emry <owen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:02:11 -0800
valleyrat12 wrote:
> I have recently purchased the car in Colorado and drove it back to
> California. The PO said that he put nothing but premium in the tank
> and I have followed suite.
Just for the record, that's a waste of money. Your engine is designed for 87 octane, and anything above that accomplishes nothing aside from driving up the value of my Exxon/Mobil stock. Thoughtful of you, but not necessary. :-)
Here, again, is a link to the gasoline FAQ:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part3/
...and a relevant quote from the FAQ:
If you use a fuel with an
octane rating higher than what the engine can use, you are just wasting
money by paying for octane that you can not utilise.
[...]
If your vehicle does not have a knock sensor, then using a fuel with an
octane rating significantly below the octane requirement of the engine means
that the little men with hammers will gleefully pummel your engine to pieces.
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN