Be careful with brand names like Diehard. They don't make batteries, they just buy them from someone else and have their name slapped on it. Who they buy the item from can change at any given time. 10 years ago, DieHard was a re-branded Delco. They were GREAT. In the late 90's they changed vendors and the batteries were awful (I started to buy Delco brand at that point). I don't know who makes the DieHard batteries now, nor do we know which one was tested by the website you talk about below. FWIW, I just replaced the battery in 1860 with a "Nascar" battery from Sam's Club... The top of the line battery (which is what I got) is a rebranded Optima. Meanwhile, my 1995 Ford still has the battery it left the dealership with 10 years ago. When it goes, I will likely replace it with a Delco. --- Matt Spittle <supermatty@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I myself prefer the Sears Diehard. Not too long > ago, I remember > reading a website that compared a whole bunch of > different style > (starting) batteries and weighed their strengths and > weaknesses. The > thing that differentiated the Diehard was that it > could withstand more > deep cycles than any other battery (even Optima > red-top). I think the > actual number of cycles was 9 or 10. > > Matt > #1604 > To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/