Martin and List - We had a spirited discussion of this topic at the annual PNDC Christmas party tonight, and I must admit that I had a flaw in my logic that had to be personally beat into me by Gary Hull. I failed to consider that the "stationary end" of the bar must remain at the aft end, regardless of which bar is used. The forward end must always be the "moving end" because of it's attachment to the forward hinge. This consideration makes it impossible to reverse the bars. My sincere apologies to all for my mistake. And 'thank you' to Gary for having the patience to gently lead me to the correct conclusion. BTW - We are working to locate the car that has the dual gas struts installed. I looked at the installation over a year ago, but I think that I can remember the details. This configuration could allow the preload on the bars to be reduced, which would extend the life of the bars considerably. The bars are designed to operate at 80% - 95% of ultimate strength according to the patent documentation ... keeping the working stresses to the lower end would be a great benefit in terms of fatigue life. Toby Peterson VIN 2248 Winged1 --- In dmcnews@xxxx, Martin Gutkowski <webmaster@xxxx> wrote: > Sorry, Toby, you're wrong. As I said to James Grant when he posted the same suggestion -