The dust shields are positioned to prevent the flow of air from the underside of the car, out towards the wheels. That is how the shields are supposed to help keep the wheels clean. I may be incorrect in my view of the situation, but anything that is designed to reduce or eliminate airflow in any direction cannot be good for enhancing cooling. As an aside to Walt, I read the follow-on message with more information about his pulsation, and I will offer the following idea. The fore/aft location of the front suspension lower control arm is set by the connection with the front anti-sway bar. If there is any wear or damage to the components in this connection, the alignment of the front wheels becomes "variable" depending on loading conditions on the wheel. If you detach the front anti-sway bar from its saddle clamps, and then detach it from the lower control arm at the threaded ends where it connects with the lower control arm, you can remove and inspect the rubber bushings that define that connection. Experience has shown that the bushings will be compressed, with cracks in the rubber, and you will see more damage on the aft bushings. These take all the pounding during braking. The bushings are cheap, and easy to replace. You will have to get another alignment after this replacement, but it should hold better. I fabricated urethane bushings for my car, and am enjoying "rock solid" performance from my suspension. --- In dmcnews@xxxx, Soma576@xxxx wrote: > In a message dated 10/30/01 8:50:24 PM Central Standard Time, > tobyp@xxxx writes: > > > > . I removed the dust > > shields to allow free flow of air through the area to enhance cooling. > > I installed new pads (Metalux brand) that run about 200 - 250 degrees > > > > i thought the dust shields had a second function - to DIRECT air onto the > brakes for cooling???? > > Andy > > Soma576@xxxx > 1982 DeLorean DMC-12 VIN#11596 > Fargo, ND 58102 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]