I've been reading this thread now for a while. I've seen plently so far about other cars, but not much about the DeLorean. How much better would my car handle with the new suspension kit? I'm not interested in lowering my car, it looks just fine to me at it's stock hight. But if a new suspension kit lowers it a little, I'm fine with that. I perfer function to appearance. Will the new suspension aid me in braking? If I have to slam the brakes @ 35mph+, will my backend still have a tendancy to slide around? Will the car be easier to control if I make a hard turn and hit water? How much faster will I be able to take turns? And how will the overall ride feel? Not just for performance, but my daily communte? I don't care about the Audi TT, the Lotus Espirt, or any other cars. I have a DeLorean in my garage, NOT an Audi! If you were to ask me, "Does a 20 year old DeLorean fitted with a new PERFORMANCE suspension out handle a new Audi TT?" I honestly could not answer. I haven't driven an Audi, but I haven't drove a DeLorean with the new suspension either. But if you were to ask me, "Could it be possible?" The answer would be a strong YES! Could a company such as Audi produce an expensive car with poor handling? You bet they could! So far from what I've seen, everyone has been putting the Audi ahead simply because it's "modern". To put it bluntly: So what? The new springs and shocks are modern as well. Just because a company has a great deal of money for research, developement, testing, and good engineers, that doesn't mean that the final product will always turn out great. Even great chefs sometimes burn food. To quote a previous posting: "As far as I know the Audi TT is a good handling car and I don't think any suspension upgrade on a De Lorean will make it outhandle any other modern car..." That's the thing, "as far as you know", and "I don't think". It seems that the only people here that do know Is DMC Houston. I don't think that DMC Houston would make that type of a claim with out having the proof to back them up. So untill we can see something, there really isn't much to debate. I'm not posting this to take sides, to correct anyone, or anything else. I'm just saying that this is an empty thread with no real substance. With no real facts/data yet, there doesn't appear to be that much to compare. It's begining to sound like some sort of "techie" debate...