[DML] Re: DML structure

["Montgomery, Ken" <kenm@xxxx>]

I also feel it's best to leave the DML as it is. I know for sure that I
wouldn't have purchased a DeLorean without the DML and the help of all the
fine people here. Yes, people ask the same questions over and over again.
But it's the energy and the spirit displayed here that helps keep the
excitement of being a DeLorean owner (or a wannabe) so high.

I really recommend that everyone download all the old archives and at least
read through all the message headers. You may find information that you
didn't even know you needed to know. Heck, you might even find your answers
there!

P.S. Watch for more info about the DeLorean Owners Directory soon!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gus Schlachter [mailto:gus@xxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 9:51 PM
> To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [DML] Re: DML structure
> 
> 
> I must agree about the DML. While I may have differences with the
> moderators and/or posters from time to time, there is no 
> doubt in my mind that this list is extremely well-run.

================================================================
Ken Montgomery	Sacramento, CA VIN #10911 'OUTTIME'
http://www.jps.net/arkham/delorean01.htm	mailto:kenm@xxxx
Northern California DeLorean Motor Club
http://members.tripod.com/ncdmc/
Keeper of the DeLorean Owners Directory
http://www.dmcnews.com mailto:directory@xxxx
================================================================