Re: [DML] (unknown)

["Videobob Moseley" <videobob@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

You might be right about that one,
the experience I had test driving a 5-speed was not good, the car that I 
tested was a
real junker and it left a bad taste in my mouth.
When I found the automatic and drove it, it was smooth and fine.

I know everyone get defensive, but c'mon guys... there is not hardly a car 
that
we can beat. Any new car will beat us.
The PRV just doesn't have any pep for that car.

I think that if it had an engine with twice the power it would be perfect.
- VB

>From: "Joe OBrien" <joeyoseppijoe@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [DML] (unknown)
>Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:41:49 -0000
>
>
>
>
>If it is so slow, then why didn't you get a 5 speed instead? There
>is a great difference between the stock automatic & the stock 5
>speed. Just remember your experience with the automatic is the
>smallest percentage as most have 5 speed transmissions. In the slow
>category you are only speaking for a few hundred with that
>transmission. Not the general population.
>
>
>Joe OBrien
>
>
[moderator snip]





To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx

For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com

To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/