Re: [DML] Door LED's
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] Door LED's
- From: "Cameron, Peter" <cameron@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:39:10 -0400
Owen made a very good point here, that one gains some tens or
hundreds of milliseconds in turn-on time using LEDs vs incandescant
for brake lights, which can be the difference between being hit from
behind and not. Are LEDs available for the Delorean brake lights?
>Disclaimer: I have no knowledge of the specific LED kit in
>question. I don't have LED door lights on my DMC, and when I do,
>I'll be building them myself from my own hand-picked ultra-bright
>LED components.
>
>That said, red and amber are probably the smart choices. Here comes
>the reason why, in the form of more information than you probably
>ever wanted to know about LEDs:
>
>LEDs work by emitting light directly; not by filtering the light.
>For example, a red LED will actually emit red light. You don't need
>to (and in fact you cannot) filter the LED light to make it any
>other color. The brightest red LEDs actually have a transparent
>lens that looks perfectly clear when off, but the light is still
>red.
>
>By contrast, incandescent bulbs emit an orange-white light, which is
>filtered by a lens to make it red/amber/whatever. For example, a
>red lens removes the non-red parts of the light, leaving the red to
>pass through. This hints at part of the reason LEDs are more
>efficient -- they emit the desired color directly, so you don't have
>to filter them to make them red/amber, throwing away much of the
>light in the process.
>
>LEDs in the red/orange area of the spectrum have been around for a
>long time, and have seen a lot of development. Advances have
>gradually permitted shorter and shorter wavelengths, giving us
>yellow, green and, recently, blue and violet. The cooler colors
>(green/blue/violet) are harder to make in high-output form.
>
>To make a light that looks white to humans, you need to mix the
>three colors we can see (red, green, blue). You actually need a
>little extra blue, because our eyes are less sensitive to blue.
>Blue LEDs are usually less powerful, too. Thus, a "white" LED is
>usually four LEDs in one package: red, green, blue, blue.
>
>In addition, to give the LEDs and even whiter appearance, almost all
>"white" LEDs use organic phospors that "glow" and enhance the
>output. These break down over time, dimming the output (whereas the
>LED elements themselves will last just about forever).
>
>So, to summarize, if you use an LED that's the correct color to
>begin with, you're benefiting because red and orange LEDs are some
>of the most bright and efficient LEDs around, and because they're
>turning electricity directly into light that's the color you want
>anyway, AND they'll probably last longer than your car without
>breaking or fading. If you use "white" LEDs, you're using hybrid
>LED/phosphor technology that will fade over time, cost more to begin
>with, and require more electrical power. On top of that, you're
>going to put it behind a red (or amber) lens and throw away all the
>non-red (or amber) parts of the light anyway.
>
>Aside from being more efficient, LEDs have two other major
>advantages: 1) they're solid state (i.e. no moving parts), which
>makes them last almost forever, and 2) they turn on instantly,
>whereas incandescent lights fade on over the course of approximately
>0.1-0.2 seconds. For this reason, I believe LED brake lights are
>safer. 0.2 seconds might not sounds like a lot, but at 65MPH, 0.2
>seconds is about 20 feet, which I believe could make a difference in
>a rear-end collision situation in some cases. The instant-on effect
>is quite jarring and grabs the attention like nothing else. If
>you've ever been behind a vehicle with LED turn indicators or brake
>lights, you've probably seen what I'm describing.
>
>If you've made it this far, here's one thing I'd recommend doing if
>you're going to use a production LED kit: Make sure the LED color
>matches your filter color pretty closely.
>
>For example, if you put a red LED behind a blue filter, you WILL NOT
>GET BLUE LIGHT. You'll get almost nothing -- black. This is
>because the red LED emits only red light, and the blue filter
>removes everything but blue, leaving NOTHING. You would never do
>this in practice, of course, but the same idea applies in putting a
>red LED behind a red filter -- if the filter doesn't match the color
>of the source light, the output will drop off severely.
>
>Regards,
>Owen
>
>VIN 10470 "1 21 GW"
>
>
>
>M. P. Olans wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> For everyone who has converted their door lights to LED's, I have
>> a question: did you go with white LED's or red and amber? What is the
>> advantage/disadvantage with red and amber LED's vs. plain white? I
>> saw them on a car at the last show I was in and the owner said he had
>> used red and amber LED's but felt he should have gone with white
>> because he thought they would be brighter. I don't know enough about
>> LED's to know if that makes sense or not, and I know some people from
>> the DML have done the conversion and others sell them, so I figured I
>> would pose the question here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt, AZ-D VeeP
>> VIN 16816
>
>
>
>
>
>To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
>moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
>
>To search the archives or view files, log in at
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN