Re: [DML] Objection to the Production Chronology notes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DML] Objection to the Production Chronology notes
- From: "Hank" <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 21:14:09 -0400
I'll second this. My entry (#1619) has: "Replaced exhaust manifold, Hood grooves, Gasflap". Yes, my car has grooves and the flap, but I have no idea how the "Replaced exhaust manifold" got on there. I had a leaky exhaust/gasket job by Rob Grady a couple of years ago, but I've also have about $10K of other, plenty more important, work done to it as well.
I'd assert that there needs to be some minimum standard for the comments on the Production Chronology - like serious frame rust, odometer rollbacks, known accidents, major non-stock modifications, questionable ebay auction histories, etc. Items that a prospective buyer would like to/need to know about before buying a car. An A/C leak, exhaust manifold, or any other easily repaired item should not be included, IMHO... Unless, of course, we have the option of including them ALL - a task I'm certain Knut would not be willing to do. ;)
-Hank (whose entry is oddly missing the warrantee card). #1619
To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx
For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com
To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN