Re: [DML] Re: undercoating

["Cecil Longwisch" <dmc1982@xxxxxxx>]

Ken,

I still have never understood why anyone competing would not just remove it. I KNOW you have put more work in making the undercoating look good rather than just removing it. Eastwood and several other companies sell products to specifically remove it but you can also just use most any solvent such as brake cleaner to just melt it away.

As a person who has used undercoating to cover sins on cars in the past, (Opel GT) I am always wary/suspicious of what this is covering up!

Guess what I am judging this time!

Cecil Longwisch

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: kKoncelik@xxxxxxx<mailto:kKoncelik@xxxxxxx> 
  To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [DML] Re: undercoating


  This is a great topic 
  Ugly undercoating
   
  YES even I agree with Dave that the cars that have no undercoating are more  
  shall we say awe inspiring and it was for that reason I brought a non  
  undercoated car to the last concours.
   
  BUT
  and this is a big BUT
   
  IT takes a lot more to keep an undercoated car looking nice than it does a  
  non undercoated one.
   
  I spent much much more time cleaning Gigawat vs any other non undercoated  
  car.
   




To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address:
moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx

For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com

To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/