RE: [DMCForum] Re: the EV1... vs Diesel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DMCForum] Re: the EV1... vs Diesel
- From: "timnagin" <timnagin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:38:02 -0400
>Yeah. It just doesn't "feel" like it's worth much. But I can't show
>you this quantitatively, it's just a feeling.
Well, by all means let's trust a feeling instead of actual research and hard
numbers. :-)
>Ha! Don't buy the more efficient vehicles then! Problem solved.
That was my exact response to BOB. If I wanted a higher mileage vehicle I
would go buy one. Don't MAKE me go buy one.
>If everyone fully understood the implications of the looming energy
>problems, I'm confident that you'd be in the minority with that opinion.
I am not convinced we have a "looming energy problem". There was a movie
made recently where a politician, not a scientist in any stretch of the
imagination, tried to convince people of this. I prefer real, hard facts
and data that can be substantiated. For what it's worth, I would not
blindly believe any "movie" from someone saying the exact opposite either.
>For the most part, it isn't. The only difference is that we have the
>chance to either do it or not do it right now. Everywhere else is
>already done.
How can anyone possibly predict how much time we have left? They can't.
They may have a rough idea, but have you ever heard a report about something
where they say, "experts are shocked by this outcome as it was not what they
predicted."
>Add to that the concerns of environmental types about the effects of
>drilling in ANWR, and it seems like a dubious prospect in my mind. A
>decent "last ditch" effort, but not something particularly interesting
>to me right now.
They can go into ANWR and drill with very little environmental impact. A
recent report I read stated the US is actually one of the lower polluters on
the planet. Don't even get me started on China.
>Sorry to say it, but I think this attitude is pure BS. First of all,
>why do we always feel it necessary to make everything into a contest
>for jobs, economy, etc. among the nations of the world? From the dawn
>of civilization we've been warring with neighboring clans, and
>frankly, it's stupid. I know it sounds very hippyish and trite, but
>if there's any problem that should bring the nations of the world
>together in finding a solution, it's this.
It's not BS. Contest and competition are what drives innovation. All sorts
of things have been invented that didn't have a use only to later find a use
for them. You want to change what nature has created for millions of years?
On a very simple level, people fighting is what makes us more strong -
survival of the fittest.
>Secondly, again, this is putting the cart before the horse. Just
>because you're sure that alternate energy sources will turn into
>another Big Oil, we should be less interested in pursuing them?
Nope.
>Most alternate energy sources don't have these same inherent dirty
>qualities.
There is still waste from manufacturing that will exist. Maybe one day it
won't be that way.
>Plus ethanol is renewable.
Not if you are using it faster than it can be renewed. :-)
>Sure, but you wouldn't argue that a junkie shouldn't bother with rehab
>because of the effects of withdrawal, would you? Solar, wind, water
>and nuclear energy are NOT dubious in terms of their promise and
>cleanliness. There is no gamble involved here.
This is not a valid comparison. Being a junkie does not in anyway produce
anything positive, other than lining the pockets of the dealers.
>I'm not talking about developing electric cars and ignoring coal-fired
>power plants. I'm talking about a paradigm shift to cleaner,
>renewable energy sources. There is no great chasm to jump into; the
>technology is very solidly proven, and estimates are very reliable. I
>just don't think there is as much doubt as you make it sound like.
Some people do, even expert scientists.
>It is rather difficult for me sometimes to put together answers to
>some of your points because I've honestly never heard anyone try to
>argue that fossil fuels are not dirtier than alternate energy sources,
>or that they are renewable. Still, I enjoy the challenge and thinking
>outside of the box.
I don't think I ever stated oil was cleaner than any alternative energy
source. I believe I stated I could find something "dirty" in an alternative
energy source.
Greg
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:DMCForum-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:DMCForum-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN