Re: [DMCForum] Re: Going totally electric powered
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCForum] Re: Going totally electric powered
- From: "Jon Heese" <dmcforum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:24:37 -0500
So is the "battery" the superconducting waveguide itself, or a pair of
superconducting waveguides rotating on an axis?
How do you input/output energy to/from this "battery"?
How do you keep the superconductor(s) cool?
I'm not touching the rest of it (black holes, deck of cards, etc).
Regards,
Jon Heese
Walter Coe wrote:
>> Any ideas yet on what kind of statistics you'll be looking at when
> you're done (speeds, range, etc), or is this still very preliminary?
>
> I insist that it be able to freely spin wheels and shred tires if I
> stomp the pedal from a full stop. I have always avoided more
> accidents using the steering & acceleration than with the brake & the
> horn. Like my Tae Kwon Do teacher used to say, "The best defense is
> to just get out of the way -- dont be there." Amen. As for top
> speed, I would rather that the speed rating of the tires be the
> limiting factor and not the ability of the rest of the car. As for
> range, the limiting factor is how much hydrogen gas I can fit in a
> tank.
>
>> I'd
> be very interested in hearing more about these batteries of yours, if
> you are at liberty and/or willing to discuss them.
>
> I'll try to keep the explanation simple, but I dont expect it will
> make much sense anyway. This technically isnt a battery, but it works
> like one. It is more like a hydrogen fuel cell except that it doesnt
> make water when it runs. Quite the opposite, really. I cause a
> variety of charge/mass particle stream to run in a wave guide in a
> circle. This is a superconducting wave guide, so once the particle
> stream is made to circulate within the wave guide then it keeps
> running until I sever the path. It can store an enormous amount of
> energy in a small space this way. With the stream circulating, the
> particles accelerate up to the speed of light. This causes nature to
> adjust accordingly because mass particles do not get along well
> traveling at light speed. The faster a mass particle moves, the
> heavier it gets and the longer it takes to decay (if it is an unstable
> isotope). This is stuff that Albert Einstein already figured out.
> The particles also become foreshortened in the direction of travel
> making more room for a follow-the-leader circulation of these mass
> particles. So the faster I spin up the stream, the more room within
> the stream there is for more particles. But now there are mass
> particles moving at or near the speed of light, and that causes a
> peculiar time dilation field. As time slows down within the particle
> stream, the effect bleeds to the outside. You see, the entire device
> behaves as a macroscopic version of a single iron atomic nuclei. And
> because it is so big, it "frame drags" everything that is close to it.
> By frame dragging, I mean that because time is running slower within
> the device, it causes time outside of the device to also run just a
> speck slower. Not enough to uncalibrate your wrist watch, but you
> could measure it with a very accurate atomic clock. This also has a
> peculiar effect on Earth gravity and causes squirrely things to happen
> with electricity. If your source of power is moving forward in time
> at a slower rate than your load, electricity appears to run backwards
> -- relatively speaking.
>
> Imagine that we have three DeLoreans each carrying a very accurate
> atomic clock, and these cars are all on a race track. The first car
> is just parked on the shoulder idling. The second car is traveling at
> 88mph. The third car is traveling at 90mph. Now change your
> perspective. These are not actually cars on a race track. Instead
> the race track simply represents a time line with the start line being
> time zero and the finish line being several minutes away. The cars
> are not traveling at a rate of speed. Instead the cars are all
> traveling forward in time at different rates. Pretend that we are in
> the fastest moving car and looking at the behavior of the other two
> cars. If our car is moving forward in time at a rate of 0.9 seconds
> per second and the other car is moving forward in time at a slower
> rate of 0.88 seconds per second then we have a bit of a contradiction.
> If these were cars literally moving along a race track then from our
> perspective it would merely look like we are moving faster and away
> from the slower moving car. If you neglect watching the road and the
> parked car and only watch the slower 88mph car then it looks like it
> is receding away from us even tho from its perspective it is happily
> moving along the road like nothing is amiss. But change your
> perspective back to the time line race track, and you have a seeming
> contradiction. If you are moving forward in time at a faster rate
> than the other car, then that slower moving car literally appears to
> be moving backward in time. But that is impossible. That would
> require that it disappear into the past -- quite a nasty
> contradiction. We've all seen what happens when Marty goes back to
> 1955.
>
> Nature has an interesting way of dealing with this. Nothing actually
> disappears into the past. Instead from our perspective the slower car
> experiences Earth gravity in a relatively backwards fashion -- it
> weighs absolutely nothing while it is running -- less than if it were
> made of styrofoam. And anything near it weighs nothing also up to a
> certain distance. It squelches Earth gravity in the following way:
> The time dilation field spills out of the device neutralizing 100% of
> Earth gravity within its vicinity. The stronger that the time
> dilation field is, the bigger the volume of the anti-gravity bubble
> that this device creates. If I make the field big enough then an
> entire car can weigh nothing as well as the ground under it which can
> get a bit messy and disorientating.
>
> Once this anti-gravity field is predictable, stable and under control
> then some very nice things can be done with it. Make two of these
> time dilation fields, put them against each other and spin them on a
> common axis, and you get an attractive source of gravity. Here it
> gets a bit confusing because there are three types of gravity: The
> first type to make is just the static field that tends to neutralize
> and frame drag other gravitational currents running thru it (i.e.
> Earth gravity). Then put two sources of this time
> dilation/anti-gravity together and counter-rotate them about a common
> axis (in the proper directior), and that generates attractive gravity
> in the circulation's center. So now I have explained two different
> types of gravity: Neutral and attracting. Here is some more about
> the attracting variety: It causes ball lightning or literally a small
> star to appear about the axis of rotation. Do this in a reaction
> vessel that is filled with compressed hydrogen gas, and the star will
> convert the mass of this hydrogen into usable electric power. But
> this is not Cold Fusion. That would be combining hydrogen nuclei to
> form helium -- a bit of a waste if you ask me. Instead this does the
> exact opposite decaying the hydrogen nuclei into free electromotive
> force which is absorbed and back feeds into the equipment that
> generated the anti-gravity field in the first place. As long as it is
> fed clean hydrogen then it converts the mass of it into electricity
> with no nuclear waste. The worst that happens is that the rare
> naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen called deuterium leaves an
> extra neutron behind that doesnt really get along with the reaction
> because it spins opposite in time to the proton. So it takes about
> 100 seconds for them to go away, and when they finally do the energy
> gets absorbed & used just like the decaying protons. So nothing is
> wasted, and no pollution is generated.
>
> There is yet a third type of gravity. Intuition would suggest that it
> must be a repelling sort of gravity, but that never happens. Gravity
> never repels. Instead this third type of gravity ignores mass
> particles and only attracts light. That is what is going on inside of
> black holes. They absorb light converting it into cold matter where
> it just sits out there in space until it either falls into a star or
> orbits it. So then why does the sun bend light? If the star sort of
> gravity reaction is only the sort that attracts matter and not light,
> then why does the sun bend light around it as per Albert Einstein's
> experiment back in the early 1900's? The reason is because the sun
> contains black holes which fall into it. And these are visible as sun
> spots. But when they fall to earth, depending on the variety, they
> either look like UFO's or cause hurricanes. The black holes in the
> sun are force-fed light which causes them to make lots of matter while
> the sun unwraps that matter turning it back into light in a give &
> take reaction that never never stops. Time moves forward inside of
> stars and backwards inside of black holes. This keeps the entire
> universe in perfect balance. The universe as a whole is always at
> time zero because for every place in it where time moves forward,
> there is an equal sum of areas where time moves backwards. We do not
> live in an expanding universe. The red shift in the distant stars is
> not caused by any doppler effect. Instead, the light from distant
> stars merely looses energy due to friction from passing black holes.
> Extrapolate this observation to subatomic particles and you solve
> everything. Neutrons are not neutral at all. They move forward in
> time converting a charge particle associated with the strong nuclear
> force into a free electron where it blows out like light does from a
> star. Protons run backwards in time absorbing that once free electron
> and converting it back into a mass particle associated with the strong
> nuclear force. Balance what the particles are doing, and you can
> predict everything that there is to know about the periodic table of
> elements. A deck of cards is useful here. Let the suit of Diamonds
> represent stars or neutrons. Let Hearts represent animal life. Let
> Clubs represent plant life. Let Spades represent black holes or
> protons. Now I have already explained the relationship between Spades
> & Diamonds which are blackholes & stars respectively. Plant & animal
> life represent similar to teach us what is really going on in the
> universe. Animals eat the plants converting a tiny amount of that
> mass into energy. Then we radiate this energy as body heat -- infra
> red which is just another form of light. So we are as walking stars.
> Plant life does the opposite. Plants absorb the light converting the
> energy of each photon into a tiny amount of mass that is released
> again once we eat it and burn it in our bodies. Sounds like I went
> way off on a tangent. Anyway, consider that a single hydrogen nuclei
> is just 4 of these particles circulating in a vortex. Helium has 20
> of them - one hydrogen in the center with another 4 pair at each
> corner. Then you keep building from there until you map out the whole
> periodic table.
>
> All forces in the universe are simply three manifestations of the same
> unified force. Each of these three forces are separately three
> dimensional. Gravity is NOT one of these forces. Any true force can
> repel as well as attract. Gravity attracts but in two different ways.
> One way attracts energy. The other attracts matter. So then what
> are the three forces? Electricity, magnetism and time. Now that's
> messed up! Time itself is yet another three-dimensional force. How
> could it be anything else? This explains the mechanism of rational
> consciousness. All of your memory is as a time line. Time zero is
> your earliest memory, and the line extends into infinity. Anywhere
> backwards on the line is your past. Anywhere forward is your future.
> The present is always stuck in the middle. You can always imagine way
> into the past or future because in your head you create your own
> personal reality, per se. Not sure anymore. You can never leave
> unless you are made to do so, and there is only one way that can
> happen. Now just being aware of such a time line proves that rational
> thought involves more than one dimension of time, hence I submit this
> as proof that time itself is at least more than one-dimension or you
> are not a rational being. That is the crux of string theory. They
> keep trying to invent extra dimensions of space to explain things.
> Last I heard, they are up to 11 dimensions with one dimension of time.
> No. Wrong. Electricity has 3 dimensions. Magnetism has 3
> dimensions. And time itself also has 3 dimensions. Rational thought
> is timeless, and I am outtatime.
>
> All of this is a bit much and confusing and no body -- I mean nobody
> understands what I am trying to say. And this isnt necessarily real.
> What is real? Real is just a bunch of thoughts in your head. I
> figured this out because I read a certain book and asked some really
> strange questions. Found answers too. Read the book of Revelation at
> Chapter 2 versus 26 thru 28. I am in way over my head. I just want
> an innocent way out of this mess. It is just a hypothesis. I dont
> dare call it a theory or a law. I cant prove anything at this time.
> But I do expect to get my car to run fast & cheap. Or at least I'll
> die trying. Death is an acceptable outcome. Life is all about pain &
> suffering. I only want to escape this messed up reality or at least
> return to whatever it was before I ever experienced rational thought
> -- I just want the fire in my head to go away. I am sick of it.
>
>> Oh, and... Welcome back. :)
>
> I dont expect to be able to stay for much longer.
>
>> We just
> need the working capital.
>
> Me too. I'm basically out of money, but I have a rental house I may
> sell. It is worth about $200K and I almost own it free & clear. The
> problem is that if I sell it then the IRS will want me to file. I
> haven't filed anything in the last several years. Its too confusing
> even with a CPA in charge. The last time I went in the hospital, my
> mom raided my house, went in my office and confiscated my book keeping
> thinking she could do it better than me. I had to put my foot down
> and promise to leave her forever if she ever tries anything like that
> again. I lost a lot of bills that way and had to pay extra for being
> late again as usual. I might need to go back to the hospital soon,
> but they treat me really terrible there. They get me agitated only so
> that they can bind my hands & feet and inject me with things that only
> make me sicker. If they do that again I will only try my best to shut
> down and disappear however that may be possible. Any alternate
> existence is better than this nightmare I live in. I will not allow
> them to do that to me again whatever good they think they can do me.
>
> Basically what I need at this point is an electric motor & associated
> circuitry that can fit in a former automatic tranny DeLorean. I could
> bolt up to the old tranny, but I would rather eliminate the tranny
> altogether. I would like it to have the fossil fuel equivalent of
> about 300 horse power. A bank of batteries as for a usual electric
> car would be very useful to regulate the output of this morning star
> reactor. I need to come up with a way to convert a very high voltage
> output into something that is low voltage without getting into issues
> of dielectric breakdown & such. It is way better to make a weak
> reaction & spin it up fast rather than a strong reaction spinning
> slowly. The stronger the anti-gravity field, the more problems the
> car has while moving due to friction with Earth gravity. Keep the
> field weak, the car weighs normal and then the effects are subtle and
> remain within the reaction vessel. This sounds too much like Carl
> Tilley. Yet another mysterious box that seems to generate free
> energy. Just humor me, okay? If you dont agree with what I say then
> just consider it a work of science fiction. With my condition, it
> helps to fantisize a bit, no? Humor, people! Nobody can prove any of
> this anyway. Please dont let them drug or tie me in the hospital
> anymore. I absolutely will not cooperate that way. The last doctor I
> saw tried to talk me into forgetting the conspiracy theories.
> Whatever...
>
>> Did you ever see the documentary "the great global warming swindle" ? It
> did an impressive job of debunking Al Gore's arguments.
>
> Never heard of it. But then I dont get out much. I just know that
> the environment is changing too rapidly whatever the cause. I see a
> way to eliminate fossil fuel burning in a matter of a few years. Then
> we wont have to find out who is right or wrong -- only what we have
> left if we make electricity absolutely free for everyone who is
> willing to behave & get along. Power over nations. Maybe I could get
> used to being a world dictator, but really, I just want a way out of
> this mess.
>
> If anyone wants to really help, get me in touch with Brian Green of
> Columbia University and my old physics professor from Hillsborough
> Community College, Mark Crane. I am absolutely through trying to
> reach anyone for any reason except for some brain fart e-mails on this
> forum. The more I try, the more I am accused of doing wrong. So I
> will just try to keep quiet and hopefully the world will stop crashing
> down around me. If either of those two guys want to talk (in person)
> about what I have said here then fine. If they are not interested
> then that is fine too. Sorry to name drop. Otherwise I am sealed
> and not discussing anything more with anyone -- especially any
> government agencies.
>
> Walt
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:DMCForum-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:DMCForum-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN