RE: [DMCForum] Indecent stickers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DMCForum] Indecent stickers
- From: "timnagin" <timnagin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:22:43 -0400
A similar thing happened with a kit car company making the Lamborghini
Countach. I think the company name was Provo.
Their replica was so exact, as in down to the millimeter in some places; it
was as if they pulled molds off a real car. Supposedly Lamborghini sued
them into nonexistence.
Ferrari did a similar thing with a kit car company but I think the end
result was they could not put the Ferrari logo on the car. Owners would
later add the badges themselves.
Disclaimer: This is all stuff I read long ago and is from memory. The
actual details and events may or may not be true. I could have even pulled
part of this out my ass.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Ryan Wright
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:11 PM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [DMCForum] Indecent stickers
On 6/20/06, Bob Brandys <BobB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I personally know Andy Perillo and what he went through with WB with
> the Batman car. Also, cars CAN BE confiscated. (It is done routinely
> in drug busts. It is done routinely with parking ticket violators. It
> is done routinely with people who drive cars that failed emission
> tests.)
Bob, Bob, Bob... Criminal confiscation of cars is done by the
government, not a private party. Surely you can see the difference
between the two entities.
I challenge you to find me any legal precedent for a private party
confiscating the vehicle of another private party where the owner
holds clear title. I don't mean heresay, I mean a legal precedent - a
transcript of an actual court decision. You won't find one because it
hasn't happened. And yes, a corporation is a private party.
> It was done with other Batmobiles. The legal theory is
> simple. It is the same as confiscation of "fake" fancy brand
> merchandise. Yes, the illegal copies were owned by the "Faker" but the
> name brands just took ownership.
A completely different situation.
> the under neath chassis has nothing to do with it.
No, you're wrong. If I built a replica Ferrari out of a Fiero, Ferrari
has no right to that Fiero chassis, which, incidentally, is what will
be written on the title: 1988 Pontiac Fiero. They can't come in and
say, "You have to give me your Fiero because it looks like one of our
cars."
> NEVER underestimate what corporations will do.
I don't. But corporations are not the government and they don't have
the same rights.
-Ryan
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/HliolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN