RE: [DMCForum] Back to SUV!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DMCForum] Back to SUV!
- From: "timnagin" <timnagin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:44:27 -0400
That's a very good point about sitting up much higher. In reference to
avoiding accidents in cars because they are more nimble, I often times see
brake lights on cars four to six ahead of me. This affords me a lot more
time to slow down or changes lanes and often before people directly in front
of me even start reacting.
I forgot about the better vantage point, but every time I get a rental car I
remember very quickly.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Stiefel [mailto:jackstiefel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 5:40 PM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [DMCForum] Back to SUV!
Actually I don't currently own an SUV, only my truck, D, Jag, and the
minivan. I have owned several SUV's in the past i.e. Jeep Grand Cherokee,
Dodge Durango, and 2 Ford Expeditions. I have also owned several cars, and
while I am sure if we went against each other in my truck or SUV and your
Taurus, you would be able to avoid our collision. But let me ask you...
Given everything being equal, would you rather be hit in a car or an SUV? I
still stand by my comments, as long as there are bigger cars out there
rolling around with inexperienced drivers, why would I want to be in that
collision in a small car? Lets also add one more positive to the SUV area
-- visibility. I can see a whole lot better in an SUV or truck. I would
venture to bet there is a study that will tell us that a truck/SUV can avoid
certain accidents better because they can see more of what's going on around
them. How well will you fair being t-boned at an intersection with your
car? My truck will fair much better.
We can argue all day long the virtues of cars and SUV's, but lets face it,
SUV's and trucks are not going anywhere so get used to them and both have
their camps. I for one am of the mindset of an accident is a matter of time
and I want the best chances for my kids, so on comes the Hummer in a few
weeks (Oh God I mentioned Hummer, you will jump on that one huh?).
Also in response to your comment about the steamroller, well that's just
silly. I want as safe a vehicle I can within reason, didn't we discuss the
absurd monster truck thing weeks ago?
Jack Stiefel - Tampa, Fl
DMC Vin 03461
Listen to the best music of all time at www.fmtimemachine.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Levy [mailto:malevy_nj@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 9:24 PM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [DMCForum] Back to SUV!
Jack,
Would you like to put your SUV against my Taurus in a
contest of accident AVOIDANCE??
Her son is an inexperienced driver. Most likely, HE
would be the cause of the accident due to inexperience
or irresponsibility. Giving a kid a truck is just
giving them more power to destroy whatever they hit.
And, I suspect I am safer in my Taurus than you are in
your SUV if we were both hit by another *CAR*....
So your theory is because the other guy has a hummer,
you need a steam roller??
--- Jack Stiefel <jackstiefel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> That's right Marc she PROTECTED her son. As long as
> there are bigger
> vehicles out on the road I am going to drive one. I
> would feel stupid
> plugging my kids into a Mini to go run about town
> with 8000 lbs trucks
> rolling around us. In the end an SUV versus a car,
> the SUV will win.
> Don't bring up rollover and the like I am just
> saying car versus car, I
> want the one that's going to win!!! I have yet to
> see a Taurus SHO run
> against an Expedition and see the SHO win.
>
> Jack
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN