The act of making Love is not necessarily for the purpose of
perpetuating the species. If that were true then married couples
would only have sex that one time a month when the women can get
pregnant. Lovemaking is a way to consumate a relationship and show
Love.
Now in the case of a Father/Daughter... Well besides the conflict of
interest between the Daughter looking up to her Father and there being
an inherent wanting to please, there is the problem with incestual
children being deformed and such. Your question could have even put
it to children like that teacher who wants or has married her student
she is in jail for for having a sexual relationship. They swear up
and down they are in Love, but the teacher has a inherent control and
the studens tend to look up and want to please their teacher. Plus it
is generally accepted that it is a wrong thing to do.
The same question could be asked to Gun supporters... Hey if it is ok
to go out and hunt and shoot animals, why not humans (don't say for
food, many hunters don't do it for that reason)? We all want a nice
male head on our wall right? The same goes with having sex with
animals. Animals can't really consent, only rely on animal instincts.
If a female dog is in heat, almost anything can be waved in front of
her and she will take it, same with the male dogs.
So 2 women over the age of 18 fall in Love. Be it because they were
abused by men at an early age, had a bad boyfriend, had a terrible
first sexual experience, they were born that way, or for whatever
reason causes them to be attracted to the same sex. They have the
right to make love to each other, plain and simple. It is not harming
society, if anything it is population control at it's minimum. They
are not having sex in public places, involving minors, throwing it in
your face... Nothing.
Now some would next argue well what about drugs? If I do drugs in my
own home why should I be bothered. Well drugs can and do lead to
criminal acts and harm to the innocent. They lead people down a path
of hurting others as well as themselves. I would say the same thing
about Alcohol, but it is more trivial the damage that we have allowed
it to continue. I suppose the line must be drawn somewhere... Wow!!!
I got it!!! The line between pro-homo and anti-homo must be the same
line as pro-pot and anti-pot.... We all agree beastiality is wrong,
and Crack is wrong, but pot and alcohol are ok... So no we are at the
line of sexuality...
Man I am rambling, sorry. FTR I am not in support of beastiality,
incest, or hunting for anything except food. Teachers should remain
teachers and Gays are ok in my book as long as a guy doesn't hit on me
lol.
Jack -- legal handgun carrying, non drinker/smoker who has lines in the sand :)
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:23:08 -0000, cruznmd <racuti1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Marc said:
>
> I want all you liberals to answer a question for me, that I honestly
> can't seem to resolve:
>
> If two men or women, love each other, and engage in sexual acts which
> are unnatural (meaning for pleasure and not for the purpose of
> perpetuating the species) and they aren't hurting anyone, why is it
> not acceptable for a man to teach his daughter that it is ok, or
> perhaps even a privilage for her to love him and pleasure him if she
> agrees and isn't forced and isn't injured? Why is it not acceptable
> for a man to engage in acts with an animal if the animal isn't forced?
>
> Is all of that acceptable simply because "it's in their bedroom and
> they aren't hurting anyone"? Where do we draw the line as a society
> and WHY?
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN