Well, Bobby, the terrorists had been plotting and planning the attack for
several years before Bush was in office. The attacks were going to happen
no matter who was in office. Observations in hindsight can very easily be
used to justify what should have been done. The same can be said that
Clinton should have done more when he was in office.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Brandys [mailto:BobB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 9:21 AM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [DMCForum] Clinton VS Bush? NO COMPARISON!
Blame Clinton for 9/11? The facts are totally against this.
On front line they presented the documented story about what BUSHIIE did
to permit 9/11 to occur. See " The man who knew"
1. As soon as he took office BUSHIIE totally cut FBI funding and staff
involved in investigating Arab fundamentalists.
2. BUSHIIE stopped the investigation of the terrorist who attached the
SS Cole. The investigator was about to catch Bin Laden!!!
3. BUSHIIE stopped the investigation in Phoenix Az of an arab "wanting
to only learn to take off"
4. BUSHIIE stopped the investigation in Minneapolis, MN of an arab
"wanting to only learn to take off"(Misouwi)
5. BUSHIIE stopped the investigation in Florida flight schools of
unusual numbers taking lessons.
6. BUSHIIE stopped the investigation and tracking of known terrorist
entering the country.
Gee, THis was like an open door policy for terrorists!!!!
No president has ever stopped these types of investigations before THat
THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION HAD AUTHORIZED. (Except for Nixon spy on
anti war demonstrators.)
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN