RE: [DMCForum] Re: Kerry...

["Jack Stiefel" <jackstiefel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I posted a reply to Robert earlier, but after reading this, I now know that
nothing anyone says to him can make him see the light.  Kind of like talking
to a white supremacist, they are always right too and have plenty of facts
to back them up too  

I now leave this argument.

Jack Stiefel
www.fmtimemachine.com
Direct listen link: www.live365.com/stations/radiocape
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Katon [mailto:bigevlbastard@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 9:40 AM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [DMCForum] Re: Kerry...

--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "wannadelorean" <mcquinlan@xxxx> >
 
>>I never said anything about Kerry.

No, I did when I pointed out his flip flops, then you drew Bush into 
the discussion.  Then you used a little redirect to make it appear as 
though I did.  Typical liberal tactics but try to stay focused.
 
>>Bush was planning to invade Iraq from day 1. Read Paul Oneill's 
book.  Long before 9/11 Bush and crew were planning how they were 
going to spin the story. 

Oh, I see, Paul Oneill says that Bush planned the war before 9/11.  
Well it must be true because we don't have a higher standard of truth 
than what Paul says.  Nothing, say, in the way of evidence or facts?

>>It was to settle a score, get some oil and scare the surronding 
Middle Eastern countries.  It was a plan cooked up by Karl Rove 10 
years earlier.  

A score to settle???  What score?  For that crushing defeat that Bush 
41 suffered at the evil hand of Saddam Hussein??  

Get some oil???  What oil?  Where is it??  This is the most 
laughable.  Should we search Kennebunkport for it??

A plan cooked up by Karl Rove??  I know, because Paul Oneill said so 
right?

>>  All it has done is turn the world against us and make us less 
secure than ever.

I suppose if the "World" only consists of the Bathe Party, The 
Taliban, Al Qaeda, France & Germany.  What about the 40 nations that 
stand in support of the war?  I guess they aren't part of 
your "world".  And by exactly what measure do you claim that we are 
less secure than ever??  I am very interested in this.

>> Funny how we let the guy behind 9/11 get away > 

Funny choice of words..."let <him> get away"  Is this another one of 
Paul Oneill's conspiracy theories?  So your saying that Bush had Bin 
Laden and decided to allow him to escape?  Sounds a lot like what 
Clinton did.  Maybe your just a little confused.

> It is obvious that you are just a Bush fan boy and that no amount 
of > discourse will be at all productive here so I'm going to bed.

It's obvious that you are just an hysterical liberal who engages in 
debate with nothing but emotion, speculation, propaganda, innuendo 
and lies.  And I can see that no amount of facts will compel you to 
think for yourself.  Just like Marc, you post assertions and 
accusations without the benefit of evidence or fact.  Sorry but 'Paul 
Oneill wrote it in his book' doesn't constitute fact!

And for the record, I have been very critical of Bush but I'll still 
vote for the guy.  




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.