[DMCForum] Re: In Praise Of Older Women
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCForum] Re: In Praise Of Older Women
- From: "content22207" <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:43:53 -0000
Forget the high school girls (college girls are merely overgrown high
school girls, as are the ones two years into the job market). What you
want is a 40 year old divorced woman (who hasn't had a man in 10 years?).
And remember -- you'll find the best sex between your ears, not your
legs.
"Killing Me Softly"? You've got to be kidding...
Bill Robertson
#5939
>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Farrar Hudkins <fhudkins@xxxx> wrote:
> Of course 22 is legal. And in some states, so is the 17-year-old I hung
> out with last weekend ... but technically I went out with the
> 18-year-old and she just tagged along.
>
> Urp?
>
> 'Twould be difficult having someone who is SO much younger, though. Try
> explaining the significance of Parliament or Yes to someone who has
> never heard of them before, much less the fact that her favourite song
> was done by Roberta Flack two decades before she existed. :\
>
> "Hey Nineteen, that's 'Retha Franklin...
> She don't remember the Queen of Soul...
> It's hard times befallen the soul survivors...
> She thinks I'm crazy, but I'm just growin' old..."
> --Steely Dan
>
> That song's a good one for you to know, Marc. ;)
>
> --Farrar
>
> Marc Levy wrote:
> > Nothing wrong with a 22 year old.. That's legal, no?
> >
> > I keep saying, my wife has not been born yet!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
| |
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN