Re: [DMCForum] Re: Greg's DeLorean Analogy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCForum] Re: Greg's DeLorean Analogy
- From: Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
See Below!
--- kKoncelik@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I suppose Kerry and Clinton would have just let 911
> go and said please don't
> do it again
Why would you think Clinton or Kerry would do nothing?
What did bush ACCOMPLISH as a result of 9/11? Has
Binladen been captured? Has the terrorist threat been
eliminated? Was *ANY* significant damage done to the
group that organized and financed the 9/11 attacks?
Instead, Bush used 9/11 and fear to pursue his Iraq
agenda (for Oil). Had bush wanted to do something
about the terrorist threat, Saudi Arabia would have
been dealt with.. but they are all friends of Bush, so
who cares if they kill a few Americans?
BTW, I don't claim Kerry or Clinton would have done a
better job. But don't make it like Bush did anything
useful in stopping terrorism since 9/11. If anything,
we are more afraid than ever which is how Bush wants
it!
> Iraq is and will always be questionable but at least
> Sadam is gone
> no threat of another invasion on Kuwait, and the
> terrorist seem to like to
> fight in Iraq than here in the US.
Did Saddam terrorize Americans? Who cares if he took
over Kuwait (well, if you are in the oil business I
guess you would care). There is shit like this going
on all over the world, and if there were no oil in the
middle east we would not care about it either.
>
> This invasion will be controversial but are we
> better off than if we did not
> invade.
Time will tell... Or maybe no? We will never know
what would have happened otherwise.
<SNIP>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN