[DMCForum] new topic PLEASE!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCForum] new topic PLEASE!
- From: "John Dore" <dmcjohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:42:48 -0000
Hey Marc (Levy), how are you getting on with your engine conversion
project? Any pics yet?
Thanks,
John
PS Please give PRV arguments a rest for a week, it is sooo boring.
--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "content22207" <brobertson@xxxx>
wrote:
> The point I was making is: my engine burns too hot timed at 13
degrees
> BTDC (that mysterious notch on my timing scale, which I am now
> convinced was transplanted, not original the the block -- even F
> series B27 is spec'd at 10 degrees). Jim thinks it doesn't get too
> hot. I have Louie as an eyewitness: plugs weren't melted (Delco
> R42's), but they definitely were headed in that direction. There IS
> such a thing as too much burn time in the cylinder...
>
> The "ass-dyno" he refers to is my perception that the car performed
no
> better timed like that. But I apparently have no idea what I'm doing
> anyway (Dear God, please don't let my driveway full of vintage
> automobiles disintegrate like the Blues Brothers the next time I
turn
> the key) so my butt must be the world's most imprecise measuring
> instrument.
>
> And don't go waving your HP numbers too proudly: even my dumbed down
> 460's, only producing 210 HP, still turn 425 lbs of torque. Move
5,000
> lbs of sheet metal (and a REAL cast frame, thank you very much) 0-60
> in 8-9 seconds effortlessly. The reason they don't scream at
> rediculously high RPM's is BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TO.
>
> How are these for sweeping statements:
> Advantages of a REAL big block (PRV is *NOT* a big engine):
> - Power -- "there is no replacement for displacement"
> - Slower RPM's -- quieter running, less stress on engine components
> - Lower operating temperature -- seals and gaskets last longer
> - Ease of maintenance -- not only is every single component larger
and
> easier to access, but you don't have to mess with them nearly as
often
>
> Final thought: doesn't your statement that "Some of us might be more
> worried about simply getting the most complete burn" (apparently in
> reference to advancing ignition time) TOTALLY confirm what I said
last
> month about American manufacturers doing just that to get through
> emissions?! Last month I was thoroughly pilloried for saying such.
Now
> you say EXACTLY the same thing...
>
> Bill Robertson
> #5939
>
> >--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Gutkowski <webmaster@xxxx>
wrote:
> > Hello to the king of sweeping statements once again. (and sorry
to
> > everyone else, I couldn't resist). Still wondering exactly what
point
> > youre making, Bill.
> >
> > content22207 wrote:
> >
> > >Internal combustion reality is: the longer the mixture burns, the
> > >hotter the cylinder and its components will become.
> > >
> > Some of us might be more worried about simply getting the most
complete
> > burn.
> >
> > >Guess you've
> > >never heard of someone burning a valve. I've also heard of people
> > >melting holes in the tops of their pistons. BTW: It's usually the
> > >"performance" crowd doing these things.
> > >
> > Yes. Because when playing with turbo engines it's all too easy.
You
> have
> > to worry about three things, all which affect each other. Boost,
timing
> > and fuelling. If one goes wrong.... my friend's Skyline melted a
piston
> > because a head gasket job had been done a bit overzealously and
the
> > compression was too high, for example.
> >
> > >Have you ever compared the operating temperature of a big block
to a
> > >little engine like the PRV?
> > >
> > You're labouring under a serious misapprehension if you think the
> > DeLorean's PRV is small. It's a 2.85l low compression, large bore,
> short
> > stroke V6. A "small" engine is a 2 litre 4cyl variable-
valve "Type R"
> > Honda engine that screams to 9000rpm and puts out nearly 200hp.
> >
> > Martin
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN