So is the "battery" the superconducting waveguide itself, or a pair of superconducting waveguides rotating on an axis? How do you input/output energy to/from this "battery"? How do you keep the superconductor(s) cool? I'm not touching the rest of it (black holes, deck of cards, etc). Regards, Jon Heese Walter Coe wrote: >> Any ideas yet on what kind of statistics you'll be looking at when > you're done (speeds, range, etc), or is this still very preliminary? > > I insist that it be able to freely spin wheels and shred tires if I > stomp the pedal from a full stop. I have always avoided more > accidents using the steering & acceleration than with the brake & the > horn. Like my Tae Kwon Do teacher used to say, "The best defense is > to just get out of the way -- dont be there." Amen. As for top > speed, I would rather that the speed rating of the tires be the > limiting factor and not the ability of the rest of the car. As for > range, the limiting factor is how much hydrogen gas I can fit in a > tank. > >> I'd > be very interested in hearing more about these batteries of yours, if > you are at liberty and/or willing to discuss them. > > I'll try to keep the explanation simple, but I dont expect it will > make much sense anyway. This technically isnt a battery, but it works > like one. It is more like a hydrogen fuel cell except that it doesnt > make water when it runs. Quite the opposite, really. I cause a > variety of charge/mass particle stream to run in a wave guide in a > circle. This is a superconducting wave guide, so once the particle > stream is made to circulate within the wave guide then it keeps > running until I sever the path. It can store an enormous amount of > energy in a small space this way. With the stream circulating, the > particles accelerate up to the speed of light. This causes nature to > adjust accordingly because mass particles do not get along well > traveling at light speed. The faster a mass particle moves, the > heavier it gets and the longer it takes to decay (if it is an unstable > isotope). This is stuff that Albert Einstein already figured out. > The particles also become foreshortened in the direction of travel > making more room for a follow-the-leader circulation of these mass > particles. So the faster I spin up the stream, the more room within > the stream there is for more particles. But now there are mass > particles moving at or near the speed of light, and that causes a > peculiar time dilation field. As time slows down within the particle > stream, the effect bleeds to the outside. You see, the entire device > behaves as a macroscopic version of a single iron atomic nuclei. And > because it is so big, it "frame drags" everything that is close to it. > By frame dragging, I mean that because time is running slower within > the device, it causes time outside of the device to also run just a > speck slower. Not enough to uncalibrate your wrist watch, but you > could measure it with a very accurate atomic clock. This also has a > peculiar effect on Earth gravity and causes squirrely things to happen > with electricity. If your source of power is moving forward in time > at a slower rate than your load, electricity appears to run backwards > -- relatively speaking. > > Imagine that we have three DeLoreans each carrying a very accurate > atomic clock, and these cars are all on a race track. The first car > is just parked on the shoulder idling. The second car is traveling at > 88mph. The third car is traveling at 90mph. Now change your > perspective. These are not actually cars on a race track. Instead > the race track simply represents a time line with the start line being > time zero and the finish line being several minutes away. The cars > are not traveling at a rate of speed. Instead the cars are all > traveling forward in time at different rates. Pretend that we are in > the fastest moving car and looking at the behavior of the other two > cars. If our car is moving forward in time at a rate of 0.9 seconds > per second and the other car is moving forward in time at a slower > rate of 0.88 seconds per second then we have a bit of a contradiction. > If these were cars literally moving along a race track then from our > perspective it would merely look like we are moving faster and away > from the slower moving car. If you neglect watching the road and the > parked car and only watch the slower 88mph car then it looks like it > is receding away from us even tho from its perspective it is happily > moving along the road like nothing is amiss. But change your > perspective back to the time line race track, and you have a seeming > contradiction. If you are moving forward in time at a faster rate > than the other car, then that slower moving car literally appears to > be moving backward in time. But that is impossible. That would > require that it disappear into the past -- quite a nasty > contradiction. We've all seen what happens when Marty goes back to > 1955. > > Nature has an interesting way of dealing with this. Nothing actually > disappears into the past. Instead from our perspective the slower car > experiences Earth gravity in a relatively backwards fashion -- it > weighs absolutely nothing while it is running -- less than if it were > made of styrofoam. And anything near it weighs nothing also up to a > certain distance. It squelches Earth gravity in the following way: > The time dilation field spills out of the device neutralizing 100% of > Earth gravity within its vicinity. The stronger that the time > dilation field is, the bigger the volume of the anti-gravity bubble > that this device creates. If I make the field big enough then an > entire car can weigh nothing as well as the ground under it which can > get a bit messy and disorientating. > > Once this anti-gravity field is predictable, stable and under control > then some very nice things can be done with it. Make two of these > time dilation fields, put them against each other and spin them on a > common axis, and you get an attractive source of gravity. Here it > gets a bit confusing because there are three types of gravity: The > first type to make is just the static field that tends to neutralize > and frame drag other gravitational currents running thru it (i.e. > Earth gravity). Then put two sources of this time > dilation/anti-gravity together and counter-rotate them about a common > axis (in the proper directior), and that generates attractive gravity > in the circulation's center. So now I have explained two different > types of gravity: Neutral and attracting. Here is some more about > the attracting variety: It causes ball lightning or literally a small > star to appear about the axis of rotation. Do this in a reaction > vessel that is filled with compressed hydrogen gas, and the star will > convert the mass of this hydrogen into usable electric power. But > this is not Cold Fusion. That would be combining hydrogen nuclei to > form helium -- a bit of a waste if you ask me. Instead this does the > exact opposite decaying the hydrogen nuclei into free electromotive > force which is absorbed and back feeds into the equipment that > generated the anti-gravity field in the first place. As long as it is > fed clean hydrogen then it converts the mass of it into electricity > with no nuclear waste. The worst that happens is that the rare > naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen called deuterium leaves an > extra neutron behind that doesnt really get along with the reaction > because it spins opposite in time to the proton. So it takes about > 100 seconds for them to go away, and when they finally do the energy > gets absorbed & used just like the decaying protons. So nothing is > wasted, and no pollution is generated. > > There is yet a third type of gravity. Intuition would suggest that it > must be a repelling sort of gravity, but that never happens. Gravity > never repels. Instead this third type of gravity ignores mass > particles and only attracts light. That is what is going on inside of > black holes. They absorb light converting it into cold matter where > it just sits out there in space until it either falls into a star or > orbits it. So then why does the sun bend light? If the star sort of > gravity reaction is only the sort that attracts matter and not light, > then why does the sun bend light around it as per Albert Einstein's > experiment back in the early 1900's? The reason is because the sun > contains black holes which fall into it. And these are visible as sun > spots. But when they fall to earth, depending on the variety, they > either look like UFO's or cause hurricanes. The black holes in the > sun are force-fed light which causes them to make lots of matter while > the sun unwraps that matter turning it back into light in a give & > take reaction that never never stops. Time moves forward inside of > stars and backwards inside of black holes. This keeps the entire > universe in perfect balance. The universe as a whole is always at > time zero because for every place in it where time moves forward, > there is an equal sum of areas where time moves backwards. We do not > live in an expanding universe. The red shift in the distant stars is > not caused by any doppler effect. Instead, the light from distant > stars merely looses energy due to friction from passing black holes. > Extrapolate this observation to subatomic particles and you solve > everything. Neutrons are not neutral at all. They move forward in > time converting a charge particle associated with the strong nuclear > force into a free electron where it blows out like light does from a > star. Protons run backwards in time absorbing that once free electron > and converting it back into a mass particle associated with the strong > nuclear force. Balance what the particles are doing, and you can > predict everything that there is to know about the periodic table of > elements. A deck of cards is useful here. Let the suit of Diamonds > represent stars or neutrons. Let Hearts represent animal life. Let > Clubs represent plant life. Let Spades represent black holes or > protons. Now I have already explained the relationship between Spades > & Diamonds which are blackholes & stars respectively. Plant & animal > life represent similar to teach us what is really going on in the > universe. Animals eat the plants converting a tiny amount of that > mass into energy. Then we radiate this energy as body heat -- infra > red which is just another form of light. So we are as walking stars. > Plant life does the opposite. Plants absorb the light converting the > energy of each photon into a tiny amount of mass that is released > again once we eat it and burn it in our bodies. Sounds like I went > way off on a tangent. Anyway, consider that a single hydrogen nuclei > is just 4 of these particles circulating in a vortex. Helium has 20 > of them - one hydrogen in the center with another 4 pair at each > corner. Then you keep building from there until you map out the whole > periodic table. > > All forces in the universe are simply three manifestations of the same > unified force. Each of these three forces are separately three > dimensional. Gravity is NOT one of these forces. Any true force can > repel as well as attract. Gravity attracts but in two different ways. > One way attracts energy. The other attracts matter. So then what > are the three forces? Electricity, magnetism and time. Now that's > messed up! Time itself is yet another three-dimensional force. How > could it be anything else? This explains the mechanism of rational > consciousness. All of your memory is as a time line. Time zero is > your earliest memory, and the line extends into infinity. Anywhere > backwards on the line is your past. Anywhere forward is your future. > The present is always stuck in the middle. You can always imagine way > into the past or future because in your head you create your own > personal reality, per se. Not sure anymore. You can never leave > unless you are made to do so, and there is only one way that can > happen. Now just being aware of such a time line proves that rational > thought involves more than one dimension of time, hence I submit this > as proof that time itself is at least more than one-dimension or you > are not a rational being. That is the crux of string theory. They > keep trying to invent extra dimensions of space to explain things. > Last I heard, they are up to 11 dimensions with one dimension of time. > No. Wrong. Electricity has 3 dimensions. Magnetism has 3 > dimensions. And time itself also has 3 dimensions. Rational thought > is timeless, and I am outtatime. > > All of this is a bit much and confusing and no body -- I mean nobody > understands what I am trying to say. And this isnt necessarily real. > What is real? Real is just a bunch of thoughts in your head. I > figured this out because I read a certain book and asked some really > strange questions. Found answers too. Read the book of Revelation at > Chapter 2 versus 26 thru 28. I am in way over my head. I just want > an innocent way out of this mess. It is just a hypothesis. I dont > dare call it a theory or a law. I cant prove anything at this time. > But I do expect to get my car to run fast & cheap. Or at least I'll > die trying. Death is an acceptable outcome. Life is all about pain & > suffering. I only want to escape this messed up reality or at least > return to whatever it was before I ever experienced rational thought > -- I just want the fire in my head to go away. I am sick of it. > >> Oh, and... Welcome back. :) > > I dont expect to be able to stay for much longer. > >> We just > need the working capital. > > Me too. I'm basically out of money, but I have a rental house I may > sell. It is worth about $200K and I almost own it free & clear. The > problem is that if I sell it then the IRS will want me to file. I > haven't filed anything in the last several years. Its too confusing > even with a CPA in charge. The last time I went in the hospital, my > mom raided my house, went in my office and confiscated my book keeping > thinking she could do it better than me. I had to put my foot down > and promise to leave her forever if she ever tries anything like that > again. I lost a lot of bills that way and had to pay extra for being > late again as usual. I might need to go back to the hospital soon, > but they treat me really terrible there. They get me agitated only so > that they can bind my hands & feet and inject me with things that only > make me sicker. If they do that again I will only try my best to shut > down and disappear however that may be possible. Any alternate > existence is better than this nightmare I live in. I will not allow > them to do that to me again whatever good they think they can do me. > > Basically what I need at this point is an electric motor & associated > circuitry that can fit in a former automatic tranny DeLorean. I could > bolt up to the old tranny, but I would rather eliminate the tranny > altogether. I would like it to have the fossil fuel equivalent of > about 300 horse power. A bank of batteries as for a usual electric > car would be very useful to regulate the output of this morning star > reactor. I need to come up with a way to convert a very high voltage > output into something that is low voltage without getting into issues > of dielectric breakdown & such. It is way better to make a weak > reaction & spin it up fast rather than a strong reaction spinning > slowly. The stronger the anti-gravity field, the more problems the > car has while moving due to friction with Earth gravity. Keep the > field weak, the car weighs normal and then the effects are subtle and > remain within the reaction vessel. This sounds too much like Carl > Tilley. Yet another mysterious box that seems to generate free > energy. Just humor me, okay? If you dont agree with what I say then > just consider it a work of science fiction. With my condition, it > helps to fantisize a bit, no? Humor, people! Nobody can prove any of > this anyway. Please dont let them drug or tie me in the hospital > anymore. I absolutely will not cooperate that way. The last doctor I > saw tried to talk me into forgetting the conspiracy theories. > Whatever... > >> Did you ever see the documentary "the great global warming swindle" ? It > did an impressive job of debunking Al Gore's arguments. > > Never heard of it. But then I dont get out much. I just know that > the environment is changing too rapidly whatever the cause. I see a > way to eliminate fossil fuel burning in a matter of a few years. Then > we wont have to find out who is right or wrong -- only what we have > left if we make electricity absolutely free for everyone who is > willing to behave & get along. Power over nations. Maybe I could get > used to being a world dictator, but really, I just want a way out of > this mess. > > If anyone wants to really help, get me in touch with Brian Green of > Columbia University and my old physics professor from Hillsborough > Community College, Mark Crane. I am absolutely through trying to > reach anyone for any reason except for some brain fart e-mails on this > forum. The more I try, the more I am accused of doing wrong. So I > will just try to keep quiet and hopefully the world will stop crashing > down around me. If either of those two guys want to talk (in person) > about what I have said here then fine. If they are not interested > then that is fine too. Sorry to name drop. Otherwise I am sealed > and not discussing anything more with anyone -- especially any > government agencies. > > Walt > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:DMCForum-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:DMCForum-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/