[DMCForum] Re: Administrative law

["dmcgman" <DmcGman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Is that what they call the pot calling the kettle black?? LOL

I was simply pointing out again that you are welcome to your opinons 
as I have stated over and over.  Just that they are hardly absolute 
fact.
As you often say if you took that personally that was not my 
intent.  Just that there are always at least two sides to any story 
or account, and that judgement shouldnt be passed based on one 
account alone.

--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmm.  Maybe I am wrong, and you are being malicious. 
> I guess Jon was correct.
> 
> 
> --- dmcgman <DmcGman@xxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Someone can do an investigation after they arrive if
> > they have the 
> > oppurtunity to speak to those involved and any
> > witnesses or look at 
> > physical evidence.  Thats part of the process.  If
> > the 
> > investitgation finds guilt they can charge somoene. 
> > If not they 
> > don't.  Thats not a conviction its a charge. And
> > that person can go 
> > to court if they find it to be incorrect.  And you
> > can sign a charge 
> > on someone as well and go to court if you are in an
> > accident.  
> > 
> > Of course as you state below it would be ridiculous
> > to place blame 
> > if someone arrived and hears only one side.  Just as
> > its ridiculous 
> > to place blame on other people, based solely on your
> > accounts, that 
> > you are claiming acted a certain way.  Its unfair to
> > pass 
> > judgements on one sided stories such as the ones you
> > are telling (or 
> > any other ones), just as it would if anyone else
> > gave accounts, 
> > claiming certain actions of people, who no one has
> > knowledge of.
> > So to make any judgements on them is pointless. 
> > Again I am sure the other people involed have a
> > different account.  
> > Now you can go in to as much detail as you want with
> > your stories, 
> > and keep telling new ones, but again they are one
> > sided, and its 
> > pointless to pass judgement on your opinon of the
> > actions of others, 
> > simply by your own accounts.  Probably why as usual
> > one or two out 
> > of 316 members here seems to agree with you.  Of
> > course I am sure 
> > most have tuned off their email delivery long ago
> > LOL.  As 
> > has been stated by alot more than one or two, most
> > understand your 
> > real motivation in your posts, whatever group you
> > wish to stir ill 
> > will in, whether they pertain to professions,
> > politics, or religion, 
> > or whatever. 
> > 
> > You are welcome to your opinons again Marc, but to
> > debate your 
> > personal accounts and views is pointless, and
> > unending.  Now you can 
> > send three replies and keep going or tell some new
> > stories from 
> > friends or more second hand accounts.  I think you
> > have drained all 
> > the controversy you can from your latest "soapbox". 
> > :-)  Maybe you 
> > can get another poll going?
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

SPONSORED LINKS

Dmc	Dml	Dmc fz10
Dmc fz1s	Delorean part	Dml forte

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "DMCForum" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---