re: [DMCForum] Re: de-emissioning (Marc)

[<jackstiefel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

busy? I thought you were unemployed? How do you think the rest of us do who actually work, or heaven forbid own their own business.  That's no excuse for removing emissions.  Now I am no big eco buddy, but they are there for a reason, like it or not.

Jack Stiefel - Tampa, FL
DMC VIN 03461
www.fmtimemachine.com

-----Original Message-----
From: "content22207" <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 10 Aug 2005 04:19:41 -0000
Subject: [DMCForum] Re: de-emissioning (Marc)

None of that crap was on the engine when Ford created the 289/302 in
1962 (neither was EFI, but that's another controversy for another thread).

What's so hard to understand about wanting to return the engine to its
basic roots?

Unless you're one of those people who blindly assumes that just
because something is chronologically more recent it must somehow be
better...

When you're as busy as I am, you don't have time to screw around with
a bunch of crap in the way just to change a set of spark plugs.

And yes: emissions components do look assinine. Don't see too many of
them on Hot Rods or show cars, do you (not that my F150 is either, but
the principle remains).

Bill Robertson
#5939




>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
> Fuel Economy *IS* emissions.
> 
> Best I can tell, you removed those components because
> your too lazy to replace them??  Or like the way the
> engine looks without them?
> 
> I sometimes try hard to see things from your point of
> view, but I can't get my head that far up my ass.
> 
> 
> --- content22207 <brobertson@xxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I thought I made that clear in my post:
> > 
> > EGR: I oppose the concept of making an engine
> > breathe its own exhaust.
> > EGR is a fuel economy measure anyway, not emissions.
> > This particular
> > system was MUCH larger than the old fashioned
> > diaphragms too, which
> > put it all in my way.
> > 
> > Smog pump: Again, the plumbing was in the way
> > (couldn't remove
> > passenger side spark plugs with it in place). Would
> > have been useless
> > once I put the new exhaust system on anyway.
> > 
> > Thermactor bank: Overlayed the coil, which made
> > installing its wire
> > difficult. Also had to be removed to remove the
> > driver side valve
> > cover. And without a smog pump the thermactors have
> > nothing to do.
> > Jetisoning them also allowed me to jetison those
> > stupid hard plastic
> > vacuum lines.
> > 
> > The engine compartment looks much less cluttered
> > now. I really don't
> > like to see a thousand wires & hoses when I pop a
> > hood. I definitely
> > don't like to work around them. Simplicity used to
> > be a virtue...
> > 
> > Bill Robertson
> > #5939
> > 
> > >--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy
> > <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
> > > And your reason for doing this was........?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- content22207 <brobertson@xxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Only removed EGR, smog pump, and the thermactor
> > bank
> > > > (and the vacuum
> > > > canister associated with the thermactor bank).
> > EGR's


--- message truncated ---

SPONSORED LINKS

De lorean

Delorean part

Delorean cadillac

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "DMCForum" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---