Re: [DMCForum] Re: Why Arguing With Martin Is Like Arguing With MyEx-Wif
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCForum] Re: Why Arguing With Martin Is Like Arguing With MyEx-Wife
- From: Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:27:54 +0100
WHAT?!
LOL - you claim I "introduced" piss into the argument, then claim you
"know full well" what it means. You pillock.
Now go and look up the phrase "to take the piss" and the word "pillock"
at www.english2american.com
Martin
content22207 wrote:
> Not to be particular, but *YOU* introduced the concept of piss into
> the argument in Message #27738:
>
> "I tell you what, Bill. You've just dropped an absolute classic
> American clanger in that last paragraph. The sort that's continually
> joked about on British TV when taking the piss out of George Bush (or
> any given American in the firing line at the time"
>
> This is why arguing with you is so maddening -- you introduce elements
> into the argument, then claim your opponent was responsible for
> introducing them. Just like my ex-wife...
>
> I know full well what "pissed" means over there. Remember: I spent a
> year in a British university.
>
> If you don't like its inclusion in the argument, here's a novel
> suggestion: don't introduce it in the first place!
>
> Urp.
>
> Bill Robertson
> #5939
---- LSpots keywords ?>
---- HM ADS ?>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN