[DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Martin G)

["content22207" <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Give me three guesses who contacted you off Forum (the first two don't
count). I'm surprised he didn't contact me directly. We once had an
agreement not to correspond anymore, but he's recently decided that is
null & void.

You'd think such a cultured and educated individual would have better
things to do with his time than lurk a DeLorean BBS.

If high school math remains valid, increasing C will always yield a
higher value of Y, all other variables unchanged. You can reduce the
other variables, yielding a lower Y, but Y would be even lower if C
hadn't been increased in the first place.

I understand the purpose of the CPR. And indeed, it does vary the
effect of the air sensor plate on the metering piston. But the bottom
line remains -- adjusting the CO screw changes the height of the
teeter totter with no ability for further variation short of removing
the back window and turning it while moving. If you tighten the CO
screw, fuel metering will *ALWAYS* be richer than if you back it off,
all other variables unchanged.  

If you're so careful to avoid ambiguity, why do you consistently
confuse PRV related posts with unrelated engine examples? Whenever PRV
weaknesses or peculiarities are called into question, you start
throwing around examples of engines that post date it by 20 years or
more. The Japanese could perfect an engine tomorrow that runs on green
tea and the bottom line will still be the same: odd fire low
compression 2.8 liter PRVs circa 1980's are ~20 MPG engines.

Urp?

Bill Robertson
#5939

>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxx> wrote:
> Bill, I got an off-list mail from another list member and I'll quote
his 
> mail rather than answer it myself. I'm sure he won't mind my quoting
him 
> anonymously.
> 
> "
> 
> I see by Bill Robertson's most recent post that he doesn't understand 
> your previous message.  Good times :-)
> 
> "
> 
> Go back and re-read my message(s), Bill. I am very careful when writing 
> them to avoid ambiguity and be precise in what I'm saying.
> 
> Answer me one question - do you understand what I mean by a straight 
> line graph being described by the generic equation y=Mx+C ?
> 
> Martin
> 
>

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.