[DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Martin G)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Martin G)
- From: "content22207" <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:32:37 -0000
No, I'm saying if they *DON'T* restrict air intake (leave that
variable unchanged), yet increase MPG dramatically, they are either
running too lean or driving like little old men or some combination
thereof.
Air sensor plate would deflect the same amount because the same amount
of air is going into the engine. CO screw would just allow less
metering piston movement for that deflection.
Bill Robertson
#5939
>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Gutkowski <martin@xxxx> wrote:
> You're talking about restrictin ghte air intake which at a basic level
> means running a smaller engine. You won't run leaner because you're
> reducing the air going into the engine. And K-Jet meters the air.
>
> Martin
>
> content22207 wrote:
>
> > Hence 30 MPG.
> >
> > My point was: you can not reduce the fuel ratio in the same amount of
> > air without running dangerously lean. F Series already runs as lean as
> > possible, and yields 18-20 MPG. If air intake that yielded such is not
> > modified (reduced), yet MPG increases up to 50%, the only explanation
> > for such damatic gains is even leaner metering -- bad news.
> >
> > Performance enhancements in other systems such as ignition may
> > increase MPG somewhat, but certainly not 50%!
> >
> > Bill Robertson
> > #5939
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN