[DMCForum] Re: Consider this: The sun is hollow.

["content22207" <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Walt has already admitted he's an alchemist. I think you may have lost
him by the second sentence.

I'm still blown away by the fact that physicists can not account for
something like 90% of the matter in the universe (they know it's there
-- they just can't account for it).

In theory, there is more of the chair I am currently sitting on that
isn't there (empty space) than subatomic particles that are there. Am
considering moving my computer to a cushion on the floor before I bust
my ass.

Why is everyone so concerned about sucking up the dark anyway?
Darkness is interesting and spooky and romantic and enchanting and
subservant. Very different from broad daylight.

Bill Robertson
#5939

>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "therealdmcvegas" <dmcvegas@xxxx> wrote:
> That is a very interesting fantasy concept, except that it's flawed
> because of basic science.
> 
> Candle wicks do not turn black because they have absorbed any kind of
> a dark mass. They turn black because of a chemical change. The intense
> heat of a flame carbonizes the material, as it is charred.
> 
> Light bulbs do not glow because they have absorbed dark mass around
> them. They glow because the tungsten particles inside have become
> excited by the flow of electrical current. This causes them to move
> rapidly, and of course glow. A byproduct of this exertion of energy is
> heat. More efficent light sources are able to offset the balance of
> lumens vs. heat. Hence why a flourescent light bulb can displace
> simular lumens as an incandescent bulb, but operate cheaper. It simply
> doesn't displace as much heat, so the extra consumption of electricity
> is not nessisarry in the production of photons.
> 
> A picture hangs on the wall. White light bounces off of it. The
> pigment of the material filters out certain colors of the spectrum,
> and then reflects back certain colors of the visable spectrum. Hence,
> you only see certain colors that make up the picture that you're
> looking at. Taking this "theory" even further, how is it possible for
> camera film to develop, if darkness is an energy, and photons are not?
> After all, the colors that are filtered thru pigments, and reflect
> thru a camera lense, burn onto the film. How would the darkness theory
> work then? (although I admit it would be interesting to selectivly
> fiter out individual colors of the spectrum by magneticly pulling them
> out: see paragraph after next)
> 
> As things age, light boucing off of the pigments will slowly bleach
> them out, and they'll loose all color as they are bleached. Black
> appears dark, because it absorbs the light. And as the pigments are
> bleached out to lighter colors, such as gray, the black begins to
> fade, as it begins to reflect more light.
> 
> Such is how a "Black Hole" operates. It's magnetisim is so great, that
> it attracts both mass, and light photons. So since we cannot see any
> light relfecting back at all, the mass is then black, due to it's
> absence of light.
> 
> Darkness is simply an absence of light. Light is not an absence of
> darkness. If not, then how else could we explain this:
> 
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/242698.asp?cp1=1
> 
> -Robert
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Walter Coe" <Whalt@xxxx> wrote:
> > > It's all in the book.
> > 
> > Dave, on that note I mention again Dark Sucker Theory.
> > Who wrote this?
> > Consider that it may have some degrees of truth to it.
> > But take this with a wave of salt, for there may be no
> > particles smaller than an atom.
> > The Matrix holds council.
> > And the emperors wear no shoes.
> > 
> > I am,
> > Captain Walt
> > because Christ is risen.
> > The evidence is clear.
> > Read about dark suckers below:
> > 
> > DARK SUCKERS
> > 
> > For years it has been believed that electric bulbs
> > emitted light. However, more recent information has
> > proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don't emit light,
> > they suck dark. Thus we call these bulbs dark suckers.
> > The dark sucker theory proves the existence of dark,
> > that dark has mass heavier than that of light, and
> > that dark is faster than light.
> > 
> > The basis of the dark sucker theory is that electric
> > bulbs suck dark. Take, for example, the dark suckers
> > in the room where you are. There is less dark right
> > next to them than there is elsewhere. The larger the
> > dark sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark.
> > Dark suckers in a  parking lot have much greater
> > capacity than the ones in this room.
> > 
> > As with all things, dark suckers don't last forever.
> > Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck.
> > This is proven by the black spot on a full dark sucker.
> > A candle is a primitive dark sucker. A new candle has
> > a white wick. You will notice that after the first use,
> > the wick turns black, representing all of the dark that
> > has been sucked into it. If you hold a pencil next to
> > the wick of an operating candle, the tip will turn black
> > because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the
> > candle.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, these primitive dark suckers have a very
> > limited range. There are also portable dark suckers.
> > The bulbs in these can't handle all of the dark by
> > themselves and must be aided by a dark storage unit.
> > When the dark storage unit is full, it must either be
> > emptied or replaced before the portable dark sucker can
> > operate again.
> > 
> > Dark has mass. When dark goes into a dark sucker, friction
> > from this mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to
> > touch an operating dark sucker. Candles present a special
> > problem as the dark must travel into a solid wick instead
> > of through glass. This generates a great amount of heat.
> > Thus, it can be very dangerous to touch an operating
> > candle. Dark is also heavier than light. If you swim
> > just below the surface of a lake, you will see a lot of
> > light. If you swim deeper and deeper, you notice it gets
> > slowly darker and darker. When you reach the depth of
> > approximately 50 feet, you are in total darkness. This
> > is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the
> > lake, and the lighter light floats to the top.
> > 
> > The immense power of dark can be utilized to man's
> > advantage. We can collect the dark that has settled to
> > the bottom of lakes and push it through turbines. This
> > generates electricity and helps push dark to the ocean,
> > where it can be safely stored. Prior to turbines, it was
> > much more difficult to get dark from the rivers and
> > lakes to the ocean. The Indians recognized this problem
> > and tried to solve it. When on a river in a canoe traveling
> > in the same direction as the flow of the dark, they
> > paddled slowly, so as not to stop the flow of dark. When
> > they traveled against the flow of dark, they paddled
> > quickly so as to help push the dark along its way.
> > 
> > Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light.
> > If you were to stand in an illuminated room in front of
> > a closed, dark closet, then slowly open the closet door,
> > you would see the light slowly enter the closet; but
> > since the dark is so fast, you would not be able to see
> > the dark leave the closet.
> > 
> > In conclusion, I would like to say that dark suckers
> > make all our lives much easier. So the next time you
> > look at an electric light bulb, remember that it is,
> > indeed, a dark sucker.

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.