 
[DMCForum] Re: Trademark
    
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCForum] Re: Trademark
- From: James Espey <james@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:40:36 -0600
I have answered many times why we feel we have ownership of the DMC logo 
trademark. We continue to disagree, as friends, so I am not sure why you 
continue to ask the question. If you don't agree with the answer, simply 
asking it repeatedly is not likely to change the answer you receive. :-)
Nevertheless, I will point out something incorrect in your second 
paragraph below. The Lanham Act clearly states that when a trademark's 
use has been discontinued, and that discontinuation may be inferred from 
three consecutive years of non-use, it becomes abandoned. An abandoned 
mark is not irrevocably in the public domain, but may instead be 
re-registered by any party which has re-established exclusive and active 
use.
James
I am the real SonnyV
(trademark application pending)
--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
 >
 > I have asked many times, James, Why DMCH feels they
 > have any ownership of the trademarks in question.
 >
 > By simply filing the proper paperwork to claim
 > ownership of a trademark that pre-dates not only the
 > claim, but also the entity claiming ownership, anyone
 > with the slightest knowledge of IP law will advise you
 > that the claim is invalid.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | 
|   | ADVERTISEMENT 
 ![click here]() |  | 
| ![]() | 
Yahoo! Groups Links
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN