RE: [DMCForum] Re: Being 13 and the big double-standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DMCForum] Re: Being 13 and the big double-standard
- From: "timnagin" <timnagin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:49:34 -0500
Nightmares wouldn't have been a problem until I got to the "thru a
tracheotomy" part....jeez!
But yea, that Viagra can be some rough stuff indeed.
http://www.zug.com/pranks/viagra/
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: therealdmcvegas [mailto:dmcvegas@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:58 PM
To: DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [DMCForum] Re: Being 13 and the big double-standard
--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Lauren" <LPLand@xxxx> wrote:
<SNIP>
> I agree with you completely, Rich. But women get away with this
> because, imho, of purely anatomical reasons. Women can be
> penetrated. Men, otoh, by virtue of the fact that they're aroused,
> imply consent.
>
> ........................LP
Hold on just one second there. I've actually had this discussion
before back in an old class, and call tell you that's not entirely true.
A man can *technicly* have unconsentual sex, and no alcohol or illicit
drugs be involved.
Aside from the obvious sodomy unto a man (oral, anal, occular, thru a
tracheotomy, or any other hole you could punch in someone), a male is
capable of an unwilling erection. Like "morning wood" for example, or
perhaps from tight jeans, etc. The other option would be unwilling
stimulation of the prostrate (fingers, broomhandle, rubber plug
aparatus, etc.). And now days, there are chemicals such as Viagra that
can cause an unwilling erection as well. There may or may not be a
"happy ending", but that doesn't matter, because the entire act itself
is unconsentual.
Hopefully, no one has too many nightmares from all of this...
-Robert
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN