Re: [DMCForum] Re: Shenanigans?

[Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxxxxxxx>]

AMX?  I am more familiar with Crestron.. LOL

I don't understand why there was no PAPER confirmation
of the vote.  I know if I used one of these machines,
I would probably be worried right now that my vote was
incorrect.  If there was a computer-generated paper
ballot that the voter got a copy of, then they would
be sure who they voted for, and the paper copy could
be used for a "manual recount" in the event that the
electronic data accuracy is questioned.

But then again, that would make it harder to cheat. 
Something both parties would be against.


--- ryanpwright <yahoo1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<SNIP>
> 
> These voting machines piss me off. I could design a
> bulletproof system
> using AMX automation equipment with half my brain
> removed from my
> skull. Why Diebold, etc, has problems with these
><SNIP>



            
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Get unlimited calls to

U.S./Canada

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DMCForum/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.