Re: [DMCForum] Shenanigans?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DMCForum] Shenanigans?



Hey Bob

Quit moaning and crying!
IT'S TIME TO TALK ABOUT CAR STUFF..

Mike    1630


--- Bob Brandys <BobB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are many inconsistencies with this election
>
> 1. Historically,  according the yesterday's WSJ, if
> the market dropped
>  >0.5% in October, the incumbent president would
> lose.  Well, it dropped
> more than 0.5% in October. and BUSH won. This goes
> against history.
>
> 2. Newly registered voters historically have always
> been more
> democratic.    How many times  did all the pollsters
> say the new young
> people who voted were mainly democratic.  Well, this
> sure did not appear
> in the numbers. 
>
> 3.  Since only 15% more people voted than in 2000
> 105 million vs 120
> million, WHY were there such long lines. These lines
> were not present in
> 2004. 
>
> 4. Since more electronic voting was used this year,
> and electronic
> voting is almost twice as fast than paper ballots -
> Why were there such
> long lines?  Was the number of polling places
> restricted.?  Were they
> moved?  Two polling places in a democratic area in
> republican
> controlled dupage were moved to areas where there
> was no parking- the
> day before the election.  On was a car dealer? Hey,
> any one who votes
> the "right" way gets a discount!  and the other was
> in basement of an
> old building on a dead end street.
>
> 5. Since most of the new voter registrations were
> young people -who did
> vote - according to the polls- then Kerry should
> have ended up with more
> democratic votes. But he got less votes - which is
> in conflict with the
> voter registration data.
>
> 6. More black voters turned out than every before
> and they voted for
> Kerry more than every before.  Than why did Kerry
> get less votes?
>
> The only conclusion is the votes don't agree with
> the registration and
> voting history statistics. 
>
> Extrapolating the historical statistics Kerry should
> have won by at
> least 10,000,000 votes. 
> Since he did not,  and if you believe that voting
> machines and vote
> counting were rigged
>
> (As Stalin said- it does not matter who votes- what
> matters is who
> counts the votes)
>
> Then approximately 15% of the votes were stolen or
> rigged.  (you heard
> the stories about the machines in florida that would
> only vote for bush
> both in the primary and in this election)
> What is strange is  NO Machine was ever found to be
> voting ONLY for
> KERRY.  You computer dudes know this is not
> possible!
>
> Only a detailed analysis of what happened by an
> unbiased party in the
> future will explain why Kerry lost.  Or we may never
> know. 
>
> Or american democracy is only an illusion!
>
> BOB
>
>
>
>



           
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links



Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN 


Copyright ProjectVixen.com. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated