Re: [DMCForum] Shenanigans?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCForum] Shenanigans?
- From: mike clemens <rmclemns@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Hey Bob
Quit moaning and crying!
IT'S TIME TO TALK ABOUT CAR STUFF..
Mike 1630
--- Bob Brandys <BobB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are many inconsistencies with this election
>
> 1. Historically, according the yesterday's WSJ, if
> the market dropped
> >0.5% in October, the incumbent president would
> lose. Well, it dropped
> more than 0.5% in October. and BUSH won. This goes
> against history.
>
> 2. Newly registered voters historically have always
> been more
> democratic. How many times did all the pollsters
> say the new young
> people who voted were mainly democratic. Well, this
> sure did not appear
> in the numbers.
>
> 3. Since only 15% more people voted than in 2000
> 105 million vs 120
> million, WHY were there such long lines. These lines
> were not present in
> 2004.
>
> 4. Since more electronic voting was used this year,
> and electronic
> voting is almost twice as fast than paper ballots -
> Why were there such
> long lines? Was the number of polling places
> restricted.? Were they
> moved? Two polling places in a democratic area in
> republican
> controlled dupage were moved to areas where there
> was no parking- the
> day before the election. On was a car dealer? Hey,
> any one who votes
> the "right" way gets a discount! and the other was
> in basement of an
> old building on a dead end street.
>
> 5. Since most of the new voter registrations were
> young people -who did
> vote - according to the polls- then Kerry should
> have ended up with more
> democratic votes. But he got less votes - which is
> in conflict with the
> voter registration data.
>
> 6. More black voters turned out than every before
> and they voted for
> Kerry more than every before. Than why did Kerry
> get less votes?
>
> The only conclusion is the votes don't agree with
> the registration and
> voting history statistics.
>
> Extrapolating the historical statistics Kerry should
> have won by at
> least 10,000,000 votes.
> Since he did not, and if you believe that voting
> machines and vote
> counting were rigged
>
> (As Stalin said- it does not matter who votes- what
> matters is who
> counts the votes)
>
> Then approximately 15% of the votes were stolen or
> rigged. (you heard
> the stories about the machines in florida that would
> only vote for bush
> both in the primary and in this election)
> What is strange is NO Machine was ever found to be
> voting ONLY for
> KERRY. You computer dudes know this is not
> possible!
>
> Only a detailed analysis of what happened by an
> unbiased party in the
> future will explain why Kerry lost. Or we may never
> know.
>
> Or american democracy is only an illusion!
>
> BOB
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
| |
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN