[doc] Practical Classics Magazine
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[doc] Practical Classics Magazine
- From: Mike Sumner <mikebmw316@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:23:27 +0000 (GMT)
I've just returned from a walk to the newsagents to see the latest issue of Practical Classics and I have to say I'm not particularly impressed with the way the magazine manages to keep getting DeLorean-related things wrong.
Last issue they referred to the car as a "DC-12" in the buying guide, and this issue (in the section about cars that went wrong) they have used what appears to be the same picture of the car from the front cover of the previous issue, but they have somehow mirrored the picture so that the reg (which should be something like "WIA 8096") is backwards.
I know I am nit-picking but my pet hate is inaccuracy, and in todays world of shabby journalism it seems that there are far too many publications that fail either to research their subject matter thoroughly, or when they have they then proceed to present it to the audience wrongly.
Accuracy should not be a bonus but the expected standard.
Just my observation.
Regards,
Mike Sumner - 178
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
DOC UK Website: www.deloreans.co.uk
Unsubscribe: doc-uk-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
** Unless otherwise stated, all messages posted to the group are assumed public and may be printed in the club magazine **
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN